Adaptive Vehicle Feature Recommendation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicle owners often fail to utilize the full range of features provided by their vehicles due to limited opportunities to learn about and interact with them, leading to a suboptimal driving experience and potential dissatisfaction with the vehicle and manufacturer.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a processor to determine underutilized vehicle features and recommends their engagement based on measured conditions and crowd behavior data, allowing for real-time reminders and configuration options via a mobile device, enabling drivers to access and configure features effectively without diverting attention from driving.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If customers are provided with extensive vehicle features and controls, then vehicle functionality and customer control over driving experience are improved, but customer ability to learn and utilize all features is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle functionalityVSAvoidfeature learnability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors vehicle usage data and provides feedback to customers about features they are not utilizing. The processor determines underutilized features by comparing actual usage against expected usage patterns, then delivers targeted information about these features through the user interface, helping customers discover and learn about available functionality without overwhelming them with all features at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables customers to self-educate about vehicle features by providing on-demand information about underutilized features. Rather than requiring formal training or manual reading, the system automatically identifies what features the customer should know about and delivers concise guidance through the mobile device or vehicle display, allowing customers to learn at their own pace and convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If customers are required to sit through vehicle demonstrations or read substantial vehicle manuals to learn features, then feature knowledge is improved, but customer time and convenience are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature knowledgeVSAvoidlearning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of vehicle usage data before the customer needs information. By continuously monitoring feature usage in the background and pre-identifying underutilized features, the system has the information ready when the customer is next interacting with the vehicle or receives a notification on their mobile device, eliminating the need for time-consuming demonstrations or manual reading sessions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than providing all possible feature information at once (excessive action), the system provides only the specific subset of information that is most relevant to each customer's needs (partial action). By focusing only on underutilized features that match the customer's usage patterns and preferences, the system delivers sufficient information for effective feature use without the time cost of comprehensive training materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If the system provides detailed feature recommendations and configuration options, then feature utilization is improved, but system complexity and processing requirements are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature utilizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of feature recommendation into distinct processing stages: data collection from vehicle sensors and usage tracking, analysis to identify underutilized features, matching features against customer preferences and usage patterns, and delivery of tailored recommendations through appropriate interfaces. This segmentation allows each component to handle a specific aspect of the complexity rather than requiring a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer between the vehicle's complex feature set and the customer. This intermediary (the recommendation system) translates raw usage data into meaningful insights, filters out irrelevant features, and presents only the most relevant configuration options to the customer, thereby reducing the effective complexity the customer must process while maintaining high feature utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10633006B2Method and apparatus for adaptive vehicle feature recommendations
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10633006B2 patent drawing
  • US10633006B2 patent drawing
  • US10633006B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a processor configured to determine that measured vehicle variable values match a predefined set of vehicle variable values associated with recommending vehicle feature engagement. The processor is further configured to determine that the feature has not been used with a threshold frequency in a vehicle in which the variable values were measured. Also, the processor is configured to responsive to the match and use below the threshold, present a recommendation to engage the feature.