Adaptive Wafer Defect Detection Using Balanced Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing defect detection methods in semiconductor manufacturing face challenges such as unbalanced labeled training data, inefficiencies in image preprocessing, and the need for manual intervention, leading to unreliable predictions and increased production losses due to defective wafers.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device with adaptive operation modes for processing semiconductor wafer images, utilizing a defect prediction model trained with balanced data, and employing knowledge-guided filters for image quality verification and restoration to automatically select and apply appropriate models for defect detection, reducing the need for human intervention and improving prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual intervention is used for defect detection, then prediction accuracy can be improved, but production time is lost and resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs automated defect detection algorithms that independently analyze wafer images without requiring manual inspection. The defect prediction model automatically processes semiconductor wafer images, identifies defects, and generates predictions, enabling the system to serve itself and eliminating the need for human intervention in the detection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection with an automated electronic defect prediction system. The system uses computational algorithms and machine learning models to substitute human operators, achieving both high-speed automated processing and maintained detection accuracy through intelligent image analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If defect detection is performed on all wafers, then detection reliability is improved, but production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection reliabilityVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs defect detection selectively rather than uniformly on all wafers. By using the defect prediction model to identify high-risk wafers that require detailed inspection, the system applies partial action only where necessary, maintaining detection reliability for critical cases while reducing overall processing time through targeted rather than comprehensive inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated defect prediction system enables rapid processing that skips lengthy manual inspection steps. The system quickly analyzes wafer images and generates defect predictions, allowing production to move forward without the time-consuming delays associated with traditional manual detection methods, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Measurement precision

If image preprocessing is performed to improve quality, then detection accuracy is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidimage processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary image preprocessing operations automatically as part of the defect detection workflow. By pre-processing images to enhance quality, adjust contrast, and optimize formatting before defect analysis, the system prepares data in advance to improve detection accuracy while managing complexity through automated sequential processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The defect prediction model dynamically adjusts processing parameters based on input image characteristics. By changing parameters such as image resolution, contrast levels, and analysis thresholds according to the specific properties of each wafer image, the system optimizes detection accuracy for varying image qualities without requiring fixed complex preprocessing for all cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple operation modes are implemented, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation mode flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The defect prediction system is designed with multiple operation modes that enable it to perform various functions: processing wafer images of different sizes, handling different image qualities, and adapting to various production requirements. This multi-functionality allows a single system to handle diverse scenarios without requiring separate dedicated systems for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between different operation modes based on the characteristics of input images and production requirements. Rather than maintaining fixed complex configurations, the system adapts its processing parameters, model selection, and analysis depth dynamically, simplifying the overall device architecture while maintaining high adaptability to varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20230054119A1Method and device with defect detection
Publication Date: 2023.02.23 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20230054119A1 patent drawing
  • US20230054119A1 patent drawing
  • US20230054119A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and device with defect detection are included. In one general aspect, a method performed by an electronic device includes determining, by the electronic device, an operation mode among different operation modes, wherein the electronic device is configured to implement the operation modes for determining wafer defects by processing semiconductor wafer images, and determining, by the electronic device, based on an indication of the determined operation mode, whether a semiconductor image, among the semiconductor wafer images, is defective.