Adaptive Device Warranty Policy Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional warranty management systems are static and rely on manual control, making them inefficient in dynamically selecting and applying warranty policies based on real-time device usage and network metrics.

Innovation Solution

A decision intelligence (DI)-based computerized framework that adaptively selects and applies warranty policies by monitoring device events, user behavior, location, and network usage, enabling automatic policy determination and dynamic updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual control and override by underwriters is used for warranty policy selection, then policy application flexibility is maintained, but processing efficiency and speed are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy application flexibilityVSAvoidclaim processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static manual policy selection to dynamic automated policy selection that adapts to real-time device usage data, network metrics, and user behavior patterns. The policy selection process becomes dynamic and responsive rather than static and manual, resolving the contradiction between flexibility and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the automated framework to independently select and apply appropriate warranty policies based on monitored device data without requiring manual underwriter intervention for each claim, thereby improving processing efficiency while maintaining policy appropriateness through data-driven decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If static warranty policies are applied based on manual control, then system simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to real-time device usage and network metrics is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidpolicy adaptability to device usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic policy adaptation that responds to real-time changes in device usage patterns, network conditions, and user behavior. This dynamic approach enables the system to adapt policies automatically based on current conditions while maintaining a relatively simple underlying framework structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous feedback loops where device usage data, network metrics, and claim outcomes are monitored and fed back into the policy selection process. This feedback mechanism enables automatic policy adjustment and optimization without requiring complex manual reconfiguration, balancing adaptability with system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated policy selection is implemented, then claim processing speed is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim processing speedVSAvoidautomated framework complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated framework is designed as a universal system that handles multiple warranty policy selection scenarios through a single integrated platform. By consolidating various policy selection functions into one multi-functional system, the complexity is managed more efficiently compared to having separate systems for different claim types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses data models and templates that replicate successful policy selection patterns from historical claims. By copying and applying proven policy selection logic across different claim scenarios, the system reduces the complexity of developing unique selection criteria for each case while maintaining high processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If real-time monitoring of device usage and network metrics is performed, then policy determination accuracy is improved, but resource expenditure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy determination accuracyVSAvoidresource expenditure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial monitoring by focusing on the most critical device usage metrics and network parameters that have the greatest impact on policy selection accuracy. Rather than monitoring all possible parameters continuously, the system selectively monitors key indicators, reducing resource expenditure while maintaining sufficient determination accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous monitoring of essential device and network parameters to enable real-time policy adjustments. This continuous action ensures accurate policy determination based on current device states while optimizing resource usage by maintaining only the necessary monitoring level required for accurate decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250069085A1Computerized systems and methods for adaptive device management
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 PLUME DESIGN INC
  • US20250069085A1 patent drawing
  • US20250069085A1 patent drawing
  • US20250069085A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are systems and methods that provide a computerized device management framework that deterministically identifies and applies device warranty policies that manage how devices can be properly used, as well as the real-world and digital circumstances of such usage respective to approved activities subject to a warranty policy review. The disclosed framework can automatically detect a device's connection to a network (e.g., a Wi-Fi network), and based on information related to the device and the established connection, inter alia, determine which type of warranty policy to enact for the device and/or user of the device. The policy determination can effectuate the type of policy, term and/or conditions and exclusions that dictate how the device and/or activity related to the device are covered under the policy, and the real-world/digital manners for which the device can be utilized.