Adaptive Weather Sensor Placement for Forecast Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In numerical weather prediction, the resolution of state estimates via atmospheric data assimilation is limited by the fixed and costly placement of weather sensors, especially in large geographic areas like metropolitan cities, where it is not feasible to increase the number of sensors permanently.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system for adaptively placing portable weather sensors in response to dynamic local conditions, using a placement system that retrieves data on social, business, temporal, and ephemeral events to modify sensor placement through weighting models that assign weights to various factors, such as event type, population density, and disaster susceptibility, to optimize sensor deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the number of sensors is increased to improve resolution of state estimates, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresolution of state estimatesVSAvoidnumber of sensors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic sensor placement where sensor locations are continuously adjusted based on real-time weather conditions and forecast needs. Instead of fixed sensor positions, the system dynamically determines optimal locations using a placement model that considers factors like forecast accuracy requirements, terrain features, and current atmospheric conditions. This allows the system to achieve high measurement precision in critical areas without permanently deploying sensors across the entire domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different sensor placement strategies to different geographic regions based on local characteristics. The placement model identifies specific areas where enhanced measurement precision is most beneficial and directs sensor resources accordingly. High-resolution measurements are concentrated in regions with complex terrain, areas experiencing significant weather events, or locations critical for forecast accuracy, while other regions use sparser sensor networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If sensors are placed in fixed locations to simplify deployment, then ease of operation improves, but adaptability to dynamic conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor deployment simplicityVSAvoidresponse to dynamic local conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static to dynamic sensor placement by implementing a placement model that continuously recalculates optimal sensor locations based on current weather conditions, forecast requirements, and environmental factors. The model considers temporal variations and adjusts sensor positions to match evolving atmospheric patterns, ensuring sensors remain in locations that maximize forecast accuracy without requiring permanent reinstallation infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses virtual sensor placements and data interpolation techniques where the placement model generates recommended locations that can be virtually tested before physical deployment. The system creates digital twins or simulated sensor networks to evaluate placement strategies, allowing operators to assess the impact of different configurations without physically moving sensors, thus maintaining operational simplicity while achieving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If portable sensors are used to enable dynamic placement, then adaptability improves, but reliability of data collection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic sensor placement capabilityVSAvoiddata collection consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor performance, data quality metrics, and environmental conditions are monitored in real-time. The placement model uses this feedback to adjust sensor positions and configurations, ensuring that portable sensors remain in locations that provide reliable and consistent data. The system tracks sensor stability, power consumption, and data quality to determine when repositioning is necessary while maintaining data collection reliability throughout the deployment period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10254442B2Adaptive placement of weather sensors in response to dynamic local conditions
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10254442B2 patent drawing
  • US10254442B2 patent drawing
  • US10254442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One example of a computer-implemented method for adaptively placing weather sensors in response to dynamic local conditions includes obtaining a set of data indicating a dynamic local condition in a geographic location of interest and adaptively modifying a placement of a plurality of weather sensors in the geographic location of interest in response to the dynamic local condition.