Adaptive Windowing for Adjacent Channel Interference Rejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication networks face challenges in maximizing network capacity due to issues like adjacent channel interference (ACI), out-of-band emission (OOB), and peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR), which are exacerbated by the near-far problem and limitations in power control and synchronization, leading to reduced signal quality and increased power consumption.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of adaptive windowing methods at both the transmitter and receiver, combined with alignment signals, to optimize network capacity by determining network normalized received power (NNRP) for each link, allowing for dynamic adjustment of window durations and alignment signal weights based on relative received power, thereby minimizing interference and maximizing spectral efficiency while maintaining standard frame structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If power control is used to reduce adjacent channel interference, then interference is reduced, but network capacity is limited and system flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjacent channel interferenceVSAvoidnetwork capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic windowing where the window duration is adaptively adjusted based on the received power levels of different links. The base station dynamically determines optimal window durations for each user link, allowing the system to balance interference reduction with capacity maintenance in real-time, resolving the contradiction between static power control and dynamic interference management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of window duration from a fixed value to an adaptive parameter that varies with received power levels. By adjusting window durations as a function of link received power, the system achieves flexible interference rejection without the capacity limitations of conventional power control approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If strict timing and frequency synchronization is implemented, then adjacent channel interference is reduced, but user equipment power consumption increases and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjacent channel interferenceVSAvoiduser equipment power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the interference rejection function from the synchronization process and implements it through windowing at the receiver. Instead of requiring continuous synchronization tracking, the system uses received power information to determine optimal window durations, separating the interference mitigation function from the synchronization function and reducing UE power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The receiver performs self-adjustment by using its own received power measurements to determine optimal window durations without requiring continuous synchronization signals or complex timing adjustments. The system serves itself by adaptively selecting window parameters based on local received power conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If strict synchronization is used, then interference is reduced, but the same waveform parameters must be used by all links, reducing adaptability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidwaveform parameter adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different window durations for different links based on their received power levels. Each link can have customized window parameters adapted to its specific interference conditions, enabling waveform parameter adaptability while maintaining interference rejection through localized optimization rather than uniform synchronization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Object-generated harmful factors

If windowing is applied to reduce out-of-band emission, then OOB emission is reduced, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveout-of-band emissionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using simple rectangular windowing rather than complex optimal window functions. The receiver applies windowing only to the necessary extent to achieve interference rejection, using straightforward correlation-based processing rather than computationally intensive optimal windowing algorithms, thus reducing complexity while maintaining effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10511338B2Network-aware adjacent channel interference rejection and out of band emission suppression
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 UNIV OF SOUTH FLORIDA
  • US10511338B2 patent drawing
  • US10511338B2 patent drawing
  • US10511338B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for adaptively utilizing transmitter windowing, receiver windowing and alignment signals for minimizing interference and maximizing capacity and energy efficiency based upon the received power ratios of links in adjacent bands of a cellular communication network.