Adaptive Wire Preheating Control to Prevent Welding Arc Instability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Laser welding systems using preheated wires face challenges with arc conditions, which can lead to inefficiencies and process instability due to unpredictable power output and wire feed speed settings, resulting in potential arc occurrences.

Innovation Solution

A system that monitors and adjusts power output and wire feed speed based on real-time measurements of voltage, current, resistance, and enthalpy to prevent arc conditions by calculating threshold values and interpolating target power outputs, thereby mitigating the occurrence of arcs during the welding process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If wire preheating power is increased to improve deposition rate, then productivity increases, but arc conditions occur leading to process instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeposition rateVSAvoidprocess stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors power values during wire preheating and uses this feedback to detect when arc conditions are developing. The controller adjusts preheating power in real-time based on the measured power values, preventing arc conditions while maintaining high deposition rates. This closed-loop control resolves the contradiction by dynamically balancing productivity and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the preheating power parameter dynamically during operation rather than using a fixed setting. By adjusting power levels based on real-time measurements and predicted arc conditions, the system can operate at higher power levels for improved deposition rate while preventing arc conditions that would cause instability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If wire preheating power is decreased to prevent arc conditions, then process stability improves, but deposition rate decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess stabilityVSAvoiddeposition rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous monitoring and feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain high preheating power levels while detecting early signs of arc conditions. The controller can then make precise adjustments to prevent arcs without unnecessarily reducing power, thereby maintaining both stability and high deposition rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary action by predicting when arc conditions will occur based on the rate of change of power values. By detecting trends before arcs actually form, the controller can proactively adjust power levels to prevent arcs while minimizing impact on deposition rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If fixed power output is used to simplify control, then device complexity is reduced, but arc conditions occur due to inability to adapt to changing conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidarc condition prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback-based control system monitors power values in real-time and automatically adjusts preheating power to prevent arc conditions. This adaptive approach maintains reliability without requiring complex manual intervention, as the automated feedback loop handles adaptations to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-adjustment based on measured power values and predicted arc conditions. The system monitors its own operation and automatically corrects conditions that would lead to arcs, eliminating the need for external intervention while maintaining simple operation for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances the stability and productivity of the welding process by reducing the likelihood of arc conditions, allowing for higher deposition rates and more efficient energy use, independent of substrate or molten pool conditions, and adapts to changes such as contact tip wear.

Implementation Method 1

A power supply is configured to preheat an electrode wire

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistive heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

The controller is configured to receive a plurality of power values corresponding to a power output of the power supply

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical measurement: Ohm's Law

Data Source

PatentUS12090583B2Systems and methods for adaptive control of wire preheating
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US12090583B2 patent drawing
  • US12090583B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A welding-type system includes a power supply configured to control preheating of an electrode wire. A controller is configured to receive a plurality of power values corresponding to a power output of the power supply and calculate an arc power value corresponding to an arc condition at the preheated electrode wire based on a rate of change of the plurality of power values. A target power output value is determined based on the calculated arc power value, and the power output is adjusted based on the determined target power value.