Adaptive Redundant Wireless Links for Industrial Control Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current industrial automation control networks face challenges in dynamically managing redundancy in wireless communication links, particularly in determining when and how much redundancy is necessary to ensure high reliability and low latency, without requiring new sensing modalities or compromising data security.

Innovation Solution

A control network with a processor and traffic controller that maintains multiple contemporaneous physical connections using wireless network interfaces, adaptively adjusting the level of redundancy based on observed performance metrics like QoS, latency, and reliability, ensuring the most appropriate means of redundancy are used at all times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple contemporaneous physical connections are maintained to provide redundant connectivity, then communication reliability is improved, but system complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the physical redundancy of logical connections by repeatedly adjusting the number of physical connections based on observed performance metrics such as QoS, latency, and reliability. This allows the system to maintain optimal redundancy levels without permanently configuring complex multi-connection infrastructure, thereby improving reliability while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The traffic controller changes the parameter of physical redundancy by adjusting the number of physical connections maintained to automation devices based on observed network conditions. This parameter adaptation allows the system to optimize communication reliability while avoiding the permanent complexity of fixed multi-connection architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If redundancy is increased to ensure high availability, then communication reliability improves, but latency may increase due to additional processing overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts redundancy levels in response to changing network conditions, maintaining high availability when needed while minimizing latency overhead when conditions permit. This adaptive approach ensures that the system only incurs the latency cost of additional processing when it actually improves reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies redundancy selectively rather than uniformly, maintaining multiple physical connections only when observed performance metrics indicate they are necessary for achieving target reliability levels. This partial application of redundancy minimizes unnecessary processing overhead and latency while ensuring high availability when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the system continuously monitors and adapts redundancy levels, then communication reliability is optimized, but processing overhead and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The traffic controller repeatedly adapts physical redundancy at periodic intervals or in response to triggering events, rather than continuously monitoring and adjusting. This periodic adaptation approach optimizes communication reliability while limiting processing overhead and energy consumption to discrete adjustment cycles rather than constant operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Quantity of substance

If moderate redundancy is applied to meet cost limits, then resource consumption is reduced, but achieving optimal reliability becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource consumptionVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts redundancy levels based on observed performance metrics, allowing it to achieve optimal reliability with moderate resource consumption by applying redundancy only when and where it is actually needed. This adaptive approach eliminates the waste of maintaining high redundancy levels during periods when lower redundancy suffices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The traffic controller autonomously monitors network conditions and self-adjusts redundancy levels without external intervention, optimizing reliability while managing resource consumption efficiently. This self-service capability allows the system to apply moderate redundancy strategically, achieving optimal reliability without excessive resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240356686A1An Automation Network With Actively Managed Redundant Connectivity
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US20240356686A1 patent drawing
  • US20240356686A1 patent drawing
  • US20240356686A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control network for supporting multiple industrial automation devices which operate in radio coverage of at least one radio access network includes: a processor configured to execute applications; at least two wireless network interfaces, each configured to communicate with the automation devices; and a traffic controller configured to provide a logical connection from an executing application to one of the automation devices by maintaining at least two contemporaneous physical connections using respective wireless network interfaces and the radio access network. The control network is further configured to repeatedly adapt a physical redundancy of the logical connection. In some embodiments, the control network is configured to determine a level of independence between the physical connections on the basis of measurements, and adapt the redundancy accordingly. The level of independence may be determined by comparing time series of a quality-of-service related quantity.