Adaptive Digital Work Instructions for Equipment Procedure Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current equipment maintenance procedures lack an efficient method to provide adaptive and personalized instructional content to operators, leading to potential errors due to inadequate guidance levels, especially in transitioning from paper-based to digital procedures.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a computing device and mobile devices to access and present instructional content in multiple formats (text, audio, video, augmented reality) based on a minimum instruction guidance specification, dynamically adjusting guidance levels according to user performance, error rates, and procedural familiarity, ensuring operators receive the appropriate level of guidance to minimize errors and enhance efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If instructional content is provided in multiple formats with adaptive guidance levels, then operator error reduction and training effectiveness improve, but system complexity and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator error reductionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The instructional content is segmented into discrete instructional blocks, each containing instructions in multiple formats (text, audio, video, augmented reality). The system divides the overall training procedure into manageable blocks that can be independently configured and delivered, allowing complex instructional content to be organized and managed through modular units with varying degrees of guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the format and level of guidance provided to operators based on real-time performance data, error rates, and procedural familiarity. Instructional blocks can adaptively change their presentation format (e.g., from text to video to augmented reality) and guidance intensity, transforming static instructional content into a dynamic, responsive training system that evolves with operator performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If adaptive guidance levels are implemented based on user performance and error rates, then training effectiveness and procedural accuracy improve, but data processing requirements and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedural accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service mechanisms where instructional blocks automatically monitor operator performance, track error rates, and adjust their own guidance levels without requiring external intervention. The instructional content serves itself by collecting performance data, analyzing procedural accuracy, and autonomously modifying the format and intensity of guidance provided, reducing the need for external computational processing and manual adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates continuous feedback loops where operator performance data and error rates are collected, analyzed, and used to adjust subsequent instructional guidance. This feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from operator interactions and progressively optimize the level of guidance provided, balancing procedural accuracy improvement with efficient use of computational resources through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If multiple instructional formats (text, audio, video, augmented reality) are provided, then operator comprehension and guidance effectiveness improve, but content creation complexity and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator comprehensionVSAvoidcontent creation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The instructional block structure is designed as a universal container that can hold and deliver multiple formats of instructional content (text, audio, video, augmented reality) within a single standardized framework. This multi-functional design allows the same instructional block to serve different learning preferences and comprehension needs, with each format delivering the same core instructional objective through different sensory modalities, thereby improving operator comprehension without requiring separate systems for each format.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11326886B2Method for controlling dissemination of instructional content to operators performing procedures at equipment within a facility
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 APPRENTICE FS INC
  • US11326886B2 patent drawing
  • US11326886B2 patent drawing
  • US11326886B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One variation of a method for controlling dissemination of instructional content to operators performing procedures at equipment within a facility includes: at a computing device, accessing a digital procedure containing a first instructional block comprising a first instruction in a set of formats including a text format corresponding to a first degree of guidance, an audio format corresponding to a second degree of guidance different from the first degree, and a visual format corresponding to a third degree of guidance greater than the first and second degrees; accessing a minimum instruction guidance specification for a current instance of the digital procedure; and, in response to initiation of the first instructional block in the digital procedure, presenting the first instruction in a particular format, in the set of formats, corresponding to a particular degree of guidance approximating the minimum instruction guidance specification.