Adaptive Artifact Correction in Digital X-ray Detectors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Digital X-ray imaging systems face issues with image artifacts due to non-ideal characteristics of semiconductor devices, such as charge leakage through FETs, leading to indiscriminate correction that increases noise and read time.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an artifact correction process that determines the necessity of correction based on specific criteria, using interspersed scan-on and scan-off reads to only correct images with significant artifacts, thereby maintaining image quality and reducing unnecessary noise and read time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If artifact correction process is applied to all images, then image quality with artifacts is improved, but noise increases and read time increases for images without artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidread time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies artifact correction selectively rather than universally. The system performs scan-off reads to detect artifacts and applies correction only to images that exhibit significant artifacts, leaving images without artifacts uncorrected. This partial application of correction resolves the contradiction by improving quality only where needed while avoiding unnecessary time penalties for already-good images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where scan-off reads continuously monitor for artifact presence. Based on the detected artifact levels, the system dynamically decides whether to apply correction processing. This feedback-driven approach ensures correction is applied only when beneficial, preventing unnecessary noise addition and time consumption for images that don't require correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If artifact correction process is applied to all images, then image quality with artifacts is improved, but noise increases in corrected images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies artifact correction selectively rather than universally. The system performs scan-off reads to detect artifacts and applies correction only to images that exhibit significant artifacts, leaving images without artifacts uncorrected. This partial application of correction resolves the contradiction by improving quality only where needed while avoiding unnecessary noise penalties for already-good images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses scan-off reads (which detect harmful artifacts) to determine when correction should be applied. By converting the detection of harmful artifacts into a decision-making mechanism, the system ensures correction is only applied when beneficial, preventing the introduction of noise into images that don't have artifacts in the first place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Measurement precision

If scan-off reads are performed to detect artifacts, then artifact detection accuracy is improved, but read time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveartifact detection accuracyVSAvoidread time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs scan-off reads selectively as a preliminary step to detect artifacts before deciding whether full correction is needed. This partial reading approach allows the system to quickly identify images requiring correction while minimizing the time impact on the overall imaging workflow by not always performing complete correction sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures that only images requiring correction are processed, minimizing noise and read time for images without artifacts, while improving the quality of corrected images.

Implementation Method 1

Light is emitted by a scintillator in response to X-rays absorbed from the source.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Implementation Method 2

The photodiodes sense the emitted light and are partially discharged. Each photodiode integrates the light signal and discharges energy in proportion to the X-rays absorbed by the detector.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8288731B2Systems, methods and apparatus for adaptive correction of a flat panel digital X-ray detector
Publication Date: 2012.10.16 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US8288731B2 patent drawing
  • US8288731B2 patent drawing
  • US8288731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods and apparatus are provided through which in some embodiments indiscriminate correction of unintended charge in a digital X-ray detector is reduced by analyzing an unintended charge of a digital X-ray detector; and determining a significance of the unintended charge.