ADAS Alert Reliance Evaluation for Driver Risk Profiling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The reliance on Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) by drivers varies, leading to inconsistent responsiveness to valid and invalid alerts, which can result in safety issues and challenges in accurately determining driver risk, as good drivers may become dependent on ADAS rather than their natural skills, while bad drivers may rely on it to correct their actions artificially, potentially creating unsafe environments due to false positives and ignored warnings.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that evaluate operator reliance on ADAS alerts by analyzing user profile data and historical ADAS alert frequency to determine a reliance level, allowing for proper monitoring and potential rewards or adjustments, such as insurance discounts, by comparing user behavior to baseline data and adjusting operator profiles accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If drivers rely on ADAS alerts, then safety issues may arise from false positives and ignored warnings, but without ADAS reliance, drivers may not respond properly to valid alerts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver response to valid alertsVSAvoidsafety issues from false positives
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by monitoring driver responses to ADAS alerts and using this information to adjust alert behavior. The system tracks whether drivers respond to alerts and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust alert frequency and intensity, ensuring drivers remain attentive without causing excessive reliance or false positive responses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting alert frequency, intensity, and type based on monitored driver behavior patterns. When drivers show signs of over-reliance or inappropriate responses, the system modifies alert parameters to optimize safety outcomes while maintaining driver attentiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If ADAS alert frequency is increased to improve driver awareness, then driver responsiveness to valid alerts improves, but driver reliance and potential for false positive responses increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver awareness and responsivenessVSAvoiddriver reliance on system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making alert frequency and intensity adjustable and adaptive rather than fixed. The system dynamically modifies alert behavior based on real-time monitoring of driver responses and historical patterns, optimizing the balance between driver awareness and preventing excessive reliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback loops to monitor driver responses to alerts and adjust future alert behavior accordingly. By tracking driver engagement and response patterns, the system learns optimal alert frequencies that maintain awareness without creating excessive reliance or causing drivers to tune out alerts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If driver behavior is monitored to assess risk accurately, then insurance pricing can be optimized, but driver privacy and data security concerns arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver risk assessment accuracyVSAvoiddriver privacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the specific data elements needed for risk assessment while leaving other driver information private. By selectively collecting and analyzing only relevant behavioral data related to ADAS alert responses, the system achieves accurate risk measurement without unnecessarily accessing or storing private driver information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11842300B1Evaluating operator reliance on vehicle alerts
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US11842300B1 patent drawing
  • US11842300B1 patent drawing
  • US11842300B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and computer-implemented method detect and act upon operator reliance to vehicle alerts. The system and method include receiving user profile data of an operator that includes a baseline of at least one driving activity aided by activation of an alert from a feature of an Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS). The system and method may include receiving historical ADAS alert frequency data including a history of at least one driving activity aided by activation of the alert from the ADAS feature. The system and method may compare the user profile data with the historical ADAS alert frequency data, determine a reliance level based upon the comparing, and set at least a portion of an operator profile associated with the operator with the reliance level. As a result, a risk averse driver, and/or proper responsiveness to vehicle alerts may be rewarded with insurance-cost savings, such as increased discounts.