ADAS Feedback Tracking for Usage-Based Insurance Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle insurance systems fail to accurately account for the use of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous driving capabilities, leading to unfair premium rates for drivers, as they cannot monitor the actual utilization of these features, resulting in inefficient use of safety technologies and increased costs for responsible drivers.

Innovation Solution

A system that tracks the use of ADAS and autonomous driving modes through sensors and communication modules, providing real-time feedback and adjusting insurance rates based on actual usage, allowing for dynamic changes in automation levels and incentivizing optimal driving practices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional insurance plans charge regular monthly premiums without monitoring driver behavior, then insurance companies can simplify pricing and administration, but responsible drivers pay inflated premiums because the system cannot account for actual use of safety features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring accuracy of driver behaviorVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback system where vehicle sensors continuously monitor driver behavior and ADAS usage, transmitting data to insurance companies. This feedback loop enables dynamic premium adjustment based on actual driving patterns and safety feature utilization, resolving the contradiction by providing precise measurement without requiring complete system redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system leverages existing vehicle sensors and communication infrastructure for multiple purposes: safety monitoring, driver behavior tracking, and insurance verification. This multi-functionality approach enables precise driver monitoring while minimizing additional system complexity by reusing existing vehicle components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If ADAS systems are made more complex with autonomous capabilities, then driver safety should increase, but drivers become more distracted using smartphones and technology to multi-task while driving

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback to drivers about their ADAS usage patterns and safety performance. This feedback mechanism helps drivers understand when and how to properly use safety features, reducing distraction by providing clear guidance rather than requiring constant driver decision-making about system operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The ADAS system automatically monitors and adjusts its operation based on detected driving conditions and driver behavior patterns, reducing the need for driver intervention and minimizing distraction. The system serves itself by autonomously managing safety features while maintaining driver awareness through selective feedback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If insurance companies update actuarial models to accurately reflect ADAS usage, then fair premium rates can be offered to drivers who utilize safety features, but the system requires complex monitoring and data processing infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsurance rate flexibilityVSAvoidmonitoring infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is designed to serve multiple functions: collecting safety data for insurance rating, providing driver feedback, and enabling fleet management. This universal approach distributes infrastructure costs across multiple uses, making the complex monitoring system economically viable while enabling adaptable insurance pricing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements progressive monitoring with varying levels of data collection based on driver risk categories and vehicle types. This parameter-based approach allows insurance companies to adjust monitoring intensity to match the complexity needed for different risk profiles, enabling rate flexibility without requiring maximum complexity for all drivers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12080160B2Feedback performance control and tracking
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 NIO TECH ANHUI CO LTD
  • US12080160B2 patent drawing
  • US12080160B2 patent drawing
  • US12080160B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for optimizing the use of autonomous features of advanced driver assistance systems and the tracking thereof. For example, a vehicle may be equipped with several driver assistance systems in which a driver of the vehicle may be assisted. The vehicle may automatically change the number of active assistance systems or suggest to the driver one or more assistance systems to activate based on several factors, including poor driving on behalf of the driver or poor driving conditions due to weather or road quality. Statistics regarding the use of such advanced driver assistance systems may be monitored and tracked and stored on an onboard database or transmitted continuously or periodically to various entities. For example, the system may operate to allow an insurance company to track the driving performance and the use of the advanced driver assistance systems to update actuarial models to more accurately adjust rates.