ADAS Sensor Dimensional Control for Working Vehicle Misalignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current working vehicles face challenges in achieving robust and cost-effective dimensional control of advanced-driver assistance systems (ADAS) due to misalignment issues caused by suspension load variation, body variation, internal squint, and misalignment of the field of view, leading to impaired functionality, failed calibrations, and increased financial costs.

Innovation Solution

A system and method implementing a tolerance stack-up methodology and statistical analysis to evaluate and optimize the dimensional variation of ADAS sensors, using a one-dimensional tolerance stack-up tool and DPM calculator to assess and adjust sensor integration, ensuring compliance with misalignment limits and reducing calibration complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If strict dimensional control is implemented for sensory systems, then misalignment limits are satisfied and functionality is ensured, but manufacturing complexity and calibration costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional controlVSAvoidcalibration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs dimensional variation analysis and tolerance stack-up calculations before actual sensor installation and calibration. By predicting misalignment risks in advance using statistical methods and tolerance analysis, the system identifies critical sensors and installation locations that require special attention, allowing preventive measures to be taken rather than reacting to calibration failures after installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the dimensional control process into separate analytical components: suspension load variation analysis, body variation analysis, internal squint analysis, and measurement system misalignment analysis. Each contributor is evaluated independently and then combined using tolerance stack-up methodology, allowing targeted control measures to be applied to specific sources of variation rather than implementing blanket strict control across all parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If multiple types of metrology equipment are deployed for calibration, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional measurement accuracyVSAvoidmetrology equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a universal analytical framework using tolerance stack-up methodology and statistical analysis that can evaluate all sources of dimensional variation (suspension, body, internal squint, measurement system) through a single integrated approach. This multi-functional analysis system replaces the need for multiple specialized measurement equipment by providing a comprehensive predictive model that works across different sensor types and installation scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical measurement and calibration equipment with a computational analysis system. Instead of using multiple types of metrology equipment to physically measure and adjust sensors, the system uses tolerance stack-up calculations and statistical analysis to predict misalignment and guide installation procedures, substituting mechanical measurement systems with information-based predictive modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If sequential calibration of each sensor is performed, then individual sensor accuracy is ensured, but calibration time and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor alignment accuracyVSAvoidcalibration throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs tolerance stack-up analysis and identifies critical sensors that have the greatest impact on overall system performance before calibration begins. By predicting which sensors are most sensitive to dimensional variations, the system allows non-critical sensors to be calibrated more quickly or with less precision, while focusing detailed calibration efforts only on the identified critical sensors, thereby reducing overall calibration time while maintaining necessary accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4685516A1System and method for dimensional control of vehicular systems on a working vehicle and a related working vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 IVECO SPA
  • EP4685516A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4685516A1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4685516A1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

System (10) for dimensional control of a vehicular system (3) of a working vehicle (2); the vehicular system (3) comprises a sensory system (4) configured to output data for assisting a driver in driving the working vehicle (2). The system (10) comprises electronic processing resources configured to: acquire and process (20-24) the data outputted by the sensory system (4) to determine the occurrence of possible misalignments in the sensory system (4) and the design capability of the sensory system (4) of the vehicular system (3); determine (23-25) optimization parameters relative to an optimized design of the sensory system (4) based on the data outputted by the sensory system (4), the occurrence of possible misalignments in the sensory system (4) and the design capability of the sensory system (4); and output (26) a report indicative of the optimization and the calibration capability of the sensory system (4) of the vehicular system (3) for implementing any optimization of said sensory system (4) based on the optimization parameters, the occurrence of possible misalignments in the sensory system (4) and the design capability of the sensory system (4) .