ADC Input Attenuation Using EVM Feedback in RF Signal Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing RF signal analyzers face challenges in maintaining optimal ADC performance due to varying signal strengths and types, leading to inaccurate signal analysis and digitization errors.

Innovation Solution

Implementing automatic attenuation of ADC input signals based on error vector magnitude (EVM) performance, using RF and IF attenuators, and a processor to dynamically adjust attenuation values to optimize SNR and prevent overrange.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the ADC input signal level is high, then the signal strength is sufficient for accurate measurement, but the ADC may enter overrange mode causing digitization errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal measurement accuracyVSAvoiddigitization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary attenuation of the RF input signal before it reaches the ADC, using an RF attenuator with variable attenuation settings. This preliminary action prevents the signal from entering overrange mode and causes digitization errors, while still maintaining sufficient signal strength for accurate measurement by optimizing the attenuation level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses EVM (error vector magnitude) performance as feedback to automatically adjust the attenuation setting of the RF attenuator. By monitoring the quality of the digitized signal and adjusting attenuation based on this feedback, the system maintains optimal signal levels that prevent overrange errors while preserving measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the ADC input signal level is low, then overrange errors are prevented, but the signal-to-noise ratio becomes unacceptably low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedigitization accuracyVSAvoidsignal measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary attenuation to prevent overrange errors, then uses feedback from EVM performance to optimize the attenuation level. This ensures the signal remains high enough to maintain acceptable signal-to-noise ratio while preventing digitization errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the attenuation parameter of the RF attenuator based on EVM performance feedback. By adjusting this parameter in real-time, the system optimizes the balance between preventing overrange errors and maintaining sufficient signal strength for accurate measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If static attenuation settings are used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ADC performance cannot be optimized for varying signal strengths and types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuation control complexityVSAvoidADC performance optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces static attenuation settings with dynamic control, where the RF attenuator's attenuation level is automatically adjusted based on real-time EVM performance feedback. This dynamic approach optimizes ADC performance for varying signal strengths and types while adding manageable complexity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-optimization by automatically adjusting attenuation settings based on EVM performance feedback without requiring manual intervention. This self-service capability allows the system to adapt to varying signal conditions and optimize ADC performance autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If manual attenuation adjustment is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the signal analysis accuracy decreases due to suboptimal attenuation settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuation control complexityVSAvoidsignal analysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automatic feedback control where EVM performance is continuously monitored and used to adjust the attenuation setting of the RF attenuator. This feedback mechanism ensures optimal attenuation settings are maintained automatically, significantly improving signal analysis accuracy compared to manual adjustment while keeping the user interface simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12562825B2Automatic attenuation of analog-digital-converter (ADC) input signal based on error vector magnitude (EVM) performance
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC(US)
  • US12562825B2 patent drawing
  • US12562825B2 patent drawing
  • US12562825B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A radio frequency (RF) test device such as a spectrum analyzer may include an RF attenuator to attenuate a received RF signal; a mixer to down-convert the attenuated RF signal; an IF attenuator to attenuate the down-converted signal; an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) to digitize the attenuated, down-converted signal; and a processor, which may select attenuation values for one or more of the RF attenuator and the IF attenuator based on an error magnitude vector (EVM) analysis, an RF signal type, and a signal level at an input of the ADC. The processor may use a look-up table for the selection. Initial attenuation values may be selected based on an expected RF signal type, RF signal frequency, or RF signal bandwidth. The attenuation values may also be selected in an iterative manner stepping the attenuation values up or down.