Additive Manufacturing Balling Flaw Validation via Multidimensional Space

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The iterative and trial-and-error nature of additive manufacturing processes, particularly in creating components with low tolerances like aircraft parts, requires numerous iterations to achieve acceptable quality, often taking months or years, due to the complexity of parameters affecting flaws such as balling in the final product.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the creation of a multidimensional space defined by parameters like beam power, velocity, local part temperature, powder bed thickness, and particle size, where additive manufacturing operations are validated as flaw-free by determining their coordinate position within this space, allowing for the generation of parts without substantial empirical prototyping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional iterative additive manufacturing processes are used to create components with low tolerances, then manufacturing precision can be achieved, but the development time and number of iterations required increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent qualityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational analysis to predict balling flaw occurrence before physical manufacturing. By calculating a balling flaw index using process parameters (laser power, scan speed, layer thickness, etc.) and comparing it to predetermined thresholds, the system identifies optimal parameters in advance, eliminating the need for extensive trial-and-error iterations and substantially reducing development time while maintaining manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical trial-and-error manufacturing process with a computational model. Instead of physically iterating through multiple prototypes to identify optimal parameters, the system uses mathematical relationships and algorithms to predict balling flaw occurrence, substituting computational analysis for physical experimentation and dramatically reducing the time required to achieve acceptable component quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple parameters are adjusted iteratively to achieve acceptable quality levels, then manufacturing precision improves, but the complexity of the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent qualityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms multiple interdependent process parameters into a single balling flaw index through mathematical relationships. By establishing correlations between parameters (laser power, scan speed, layer thickness, etc.) and balling flaw occurrence, the system reduces the complexity of managing multiple parameters while maintaining the ability to control manufacturing precision through the simplified index

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If extensive empirical prototyping is performed to validate additive manufacturing operations, then reliability of the process improves, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess validationVSAvoidproduction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the manufacturing process through computational modeling. By simulating balling flaw occurrence using process parameters and predetermined mathematical relationships, the system validates operations in a virtual environment before physical manufacturing, eliminating the need for extensive empirical prototyping and substantially improving productivity while maintaining process reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10252511B2System and process for evaluating and validating additive manufacturing operations
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 RTX CORP
  • US10252511B2 patent drawing
  • US10252511B2 patent drawing
  • US10252511B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of evaluating and validating additive manufacturing operations includes generating a multidimensional space defined by a plurality of bounds, each of the bounds being defined on a distinct parameter of an additive manufacturing process and each of the bounds being directly related to the occurrence of a balling flaw, each of the parameters being a dimension in a multi-dimensional coordinate system, determining a coordinate position of at least one additive manufacturing operation within the multi-dimensional coordinate system, and categorizing the operation as free of balling flaws when the coordinate position is within the multi-dimensional space.