Additive Manufacturing Process Control Using Build-to-Build Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing processes rely on iterative, human-in-the-loop methods for process parameter adjustment, which are prone to errors and are time-consuming, as they use after-the-fact data collection to address non-conformances and build problems in powder bed machines.

Innovation Solution

An integrated process control method utilizing software to analyze multiple data sources and leverage learning from previous builds to optimize subsequent processes automatically, by comparing the condition of finished workpieces to predetermined standards and adjusting parameters accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated process control is implemented, then productivity and efficiency are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuild process efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback control by sensing workpiece conditions, comparing them to predetermined standards, and automatically adjusting process parameters. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to self-correct and optimize builds without human intervention, improving productivity while managing complexity through systematic automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs self-service by automatically analyzing build data, identifying non-conformances, and adjusting process parameters without requiring human operators. The system leverages learning from previous builds to autonomously optimize subsequent builds, reducing labor requirements and improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If iterative human-in-the-loop methods are used, then manufacturing precision can be maintained, but loss of time and labor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece qualityVSAvoidparameter adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing predetermined standards and automated adjustment protocols before builds begin. Process parameters are pre-configured and the system is prepared to automatically respond to deviations, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual iteration while maintaining precision through pre-planned control strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual human decision-making and adjustment processes with automated electronic control systems. Sensors, processors, and actuators substitute for human operators in detecting workpiece conditions and adjusting parameters, maintaining manufacturing precision while dramatically reducing the time and labor associated with iterative adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual parameter adjustment is performed, then adaptability to build problems is improved, but reliability decreases due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to build problemsVSAvoidprocess consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The automated feedback control system continuously monitors build conditions and automatically adjusts parameters in response to detected deviations. This systematic feedback mechanism provides consistent, repeatable responses to build problems without human error, improving reliability while maintaining adaptability through real-time parameter adjustment based on actual build conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables automated, efficient, and error-reduced optimization of additive manufacturing processes, improving workpiece quality and reducing the time and labor required for parameter adjustments.

Implementation Method 1

one or more energy beams are used to selectively fuse a powder contained in an additive manufacturing machine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

direct metal laser melting (DMLM)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective laser melting: Selective Laser Sintering

Implementation Method 3

The shielding gas is used to transfer heat away from the surface of the powder bed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection cooling: Convection

Implementation Method 4

the interaction of the energy beam with the powder generates an emissions plume which can cause detrimental effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS11318535B2Method for process control in additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2022.05.03 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11318535B2 patent drawing
  • US11318535B2 patent drawing
  • US11318535B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for controlling an additive manufacturing process in which one or more energy beams are used to selectively fuse a powder contained in an additive manufacturing machine having a gas flow therein in order to form a workpiece, in the presence of one or more plumes generated by interaction of the one or more energy beams with the powder, wherein the process is controlled by an electronic controller. The method includes: performing a build process to form a workpiece using a set of initial process parameters; sensing a condition of the finished workpiece; using the electronic controller, comparing the condition of the finished workpiece to a predetermined standard; using the electronic controller, changing one or more of the initial process parameters to define a set of revised process parameters; and performing a subsequent build process using the revised process parameters.