Additive Manufacturing Counterweight for Scroll Compressor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional counterweights for scroll compressors require different sizes, shapes, and masses for various compressor models, leading to increased costs due to the need for multiple tools and handling equipment, as well as design changes within the compressor housing.

Innovation Solution

A counterweight manufactured by additive manufacturing, featuring a mounting portion with a first density and a mass portion with a second density, allowing for easy adaptation of mass and center-of-gravity position while maintaining common outer dimensions, thus enabling use across multiple compressor models with reduced costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If different sizes and shapes of counterweights are used for different compressor models, then the mass and center-of-gravity can be optimized for each model, but different tools and handling equipment are required, increasing costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass optimizationVSAvoidtooling variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by varying the infill density (material distribution) within a standardized counterweight geometry. By adjusting the infill percentage and pattern in different regions of the counterweight, the mass and center-of-gravity can be precisely controlled to match different compressor model requirements, while the external dimensions and mounting features remain constant, allowing universal tooling and handling equipment to be used across all models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by designing a standardized counterweight outer geometry that can serve multiple compressor models. The universal mounting portion with consistent dimensions and attachment features allows the same counterweight design to be used across different models, while the internal infill structure is customized through additive manufacturing parameters to achieve model-specific mass and balance characteristics, eliminating the need for model-specific tools and handling equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If individual shaping or machining of counterweights is performed, then precise mass adaptation is achieved, but production costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass adaptation precisionVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical machining processes with additive manufacturing technology. Instead of machining counterweights from solid material to achieve precise mass and center-of-gravity, the invention uses 3D printing to directly create the counterweight with optimized infill structures. This substitution of manufacturing methodology enables precise mass adaptation while significantly reducing production costs by eliminating expensive machining operations and material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes in the additive manufacturing process, specifically varying the infill density and pattern parameters, to achieve precise mass adaptation. By controlling the infill percentage (e.g., 10-100%) and pattern type in different regions of the counterweight during the printing process, the exact mass and center-of-gravity position can be achieved without any post-manufacturing machining, thereby reducing production costs while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If different counterweight geometries are used, then mass optimization is achieved, but design changes within the compressor housing are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass optimizationVSAvoidhousing design changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by maintaining a standardized counterweight outer geometry and instead optimizing the internal infill parameters (density, pattern, distribution) to achieve the required mass and balance characteristics. This approach allows mass optimization for different compressor models without changing the external dimensions or shape of the counterweight, thereby eliminating the need for design changes in the compressor housing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by designing a standardized counterweight geometry that fits all compressor models in the product line. The universal external dimensions and mounting features allow the same counterweight shape to be used across different models, while the internal infill structure is customized through additive manufacturing to achieve model-specific mass optimization, thereby eliminating the need for housing design changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12320357B2Counterweight for a scroll compressor
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 DANFOSS COMML COMPRESSORS SA
  • US12320357B2 patent drawing
  • US12320357B2 patent drawing
  • US12320357B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The counterweight (26) is manufactured by an additive manufacturing process and includes a mounting portion (28) having a first density and a mass portion (29) having a second density, the mass portion (29) being formed radially outward of the mounting portion (28), wherein the first density of the mounting portion (28) and the second density of the mass portion (29) are different from each other, and wherein the mass portion (29) includes at least a first segment (29.1) having a first segment density and a second segment (29.2) having a second segment density which is different from the first segment density.