Redundant Additive Flow Feedback for Cement Mixing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cementing operations face inaccuracies and costly mistakes due to uncalibrated or malfunctioning flow meters, which fail to provide reliable feedback for the accurate delivery of liquid additives in cement mixing processes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an information handling system with a diagnostic feedback loop that includes a flow meter, secondary pump, motor, variable frequency drive, and controller to monitor and control the flow rate of liquid additives, utilizing level sensors and weight scales for redundancy and accurate measurement, ensuring precise delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a flow meter is used to measure and monitor the flow rate of liquid additive, then the flow rate can be measured, but the measurement may be inaccurate if the flow meter is not calibrated or malfunctions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate measurementVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration of the flow meter using a master meter before actual cementing operations. This preliminary calibration establishes accurate measurement baselines and ensures the flow meter is properly calibrated, preventing measurement inaccuracies before they occur during critical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the control system continuously monitors flow meter readings and compares them against expected values or master meter calibration data. When discrepancies are detected, the system can trigger alarms, adjust pump speeds, or initiate recalibration procedures, ensuring continuous measurement reliability throughout the operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If a single flow meter is used for monitoring, then the system is simple, but the system fails when the flow meter malfunctions or provides missing feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system complexityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a hierarchical monitoring structure with different levels of measurement quality. The master meter provides high-precision reference measurements for calibration, while the flow meter provides continuous operational monitoring. This local differentiation of measurement quality allows the system to maintain simplicity while ensuring reliability through the master meter's authoritative measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calibration using the master meter before relying on the flow meter for continuous monitoring. This preliminary action establishes the flow meter's accuracy against the more reliable master meter, creating a foundation of trust that allows the simpler flow meter to be used during actual operations while maintaining overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If manual monitoring and calibration of flow meters is performed, then the system is easier to operate, but it leads to inaccurate measurements and costly mistakes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operationVSAvoidflow rate measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service calibration capabilities where the control system automatically compares flow meter readings against master meter data and performs adjustments without requiring manual intervention. The system can automatically detect calibration drift, initiate recalibration procedures, and verify measurement accuracy, maintaining high precision while minimizing the need for manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously receives feedback from both the master meter and flow meter, automatically processes this data to detect discrepancies, and triggers appropriate responses such as alarms or automatic adjustments. This automated feedback loop maintains measurement precision without requiring constant manual monitoring, thereby preserving ease of operation while ensuring accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11931920B2Additive control method utilizing smart redundant feedback
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US11931920B2 patent drawing
  • US11931920B2 patent drawing
  • US11931920B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure provides a method of monitoring a flow rate of a liquid additive comprising measuring the flow rate of the liquid additive with a flow meter; transmitting the measurements of the flow rate to a controller; transmitting, from a variable frequency drive (VFD), measurements of a rotational speed of a motor to the controller, wherein the VFD is coupled to the motor; transmitting measurements from a level sensor to the controller; determining whether the flow rate of the liquid additive is a non-zero rate; utilizing the measurements transmitted to the controller as feedback to compare against a designated set point; calculating an error between the feedback and the designated set point to calculate an updated output; and transmitting the updated output to the VFD to change the flow rate of the liquid additive.