Additive Fuel Cell Flow Fields with Varying Cross-Sectional Areas

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for manufacturing flow field plates for fuel cells often result in stress points and increased thickness or weight due to machining, which contradicts the goal of creating smaller and lighter fuel cells.

Innovation Solution

The use of additive manufacturing to create flow field channels with varying cross-sectional areas, allowing for precise material application and elimination of special tooling, resulting in thinner, lighter plates with controlled pressure drop and gas flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional machining or molding methods are used to create flow field channels, then the channels can be formed in the plate, but stress points are created within the plate requiring greater thickness and/or weight for structural accommodation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel formationVSAvoidplate weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing method from subtractive (machining) or high-pressure molding to additive manufacturing. This parameter change in the manufacturing process eliminates stress points while enabling lighter plate designs with varying cross-sectional areas in the flow channels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dimensional variation in the flow channel cross-section by adding depth variation (varying cross-sectional area as a function of depth). This third dimension allows for optimized flow distribution without increasing overall plate thickness or weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional machining or molding methods are used to create flow field channels, then the channels can be formed in the plate, but the plate thickness and/or weight must be greater than desired for structural accommodation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel formationVSAvoidplate thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing method from conventional machining or molding to additive manufacturing, which eliminates the need for increased plate thickness to accommodate stress points. The additive process inherently creates stress-free structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes depth variation of the flow channels (varying cross-sectional area as a function of depth) to optimize flow distribution while maintaining reduced plate thickness. This dimensional approach allows structural efficiency without compromising flow performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If additive manufacturing is used to form channel walls directly onto the plate body, then material is applied precisely and special tooling is eliminated, but the manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial application precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The additive manufacturing process is self-service in that it builds channels layer by layer directly on the plate body without requiring external tooling or fixtures. The process inherently positions and forms the channels with precise material deposition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the need for special machining tooling and complex fixture setups by using additive manufacturing. This eliminates the complex manufacturing equipment and tooling required for conventional methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9444108B2Additive manufacturing for fuel cell flow fields
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • US9444108B2 patent drawing
  • US9444108B2 patent drawing
  • US9444108B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plate for a fuel cell includes a first plate body defining a first flow field channel in a first surface thereof. The first flow field channel has a cross-sectional area that varies as a function of depth from the first surface of the plate body toward an opposed second surface. The cross-sectional area can increase and/or decrease from the first surface toward the opposed second surface.