Additively Oriented Permanent Magnets for Complex Field Shaping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing bulk permanent magnets are limited by their geometry and material costs, leading to inefficiencies in magnetic field distribution and susceptibility to demagnetization, especially in regions like corners and surfaces, which restricts the weight and volume efficiency of magnetic materials in applications such as electric motors.

Innovation Solution

The development of a permanent magnet structure with location-specific magnetic orientations and crystallographic textures achieved through additive manufacturing, allowing for independent alignment of magnetic domains and grains during solidification, enabling tailored magnetic field shapes and enhanced resistance to demagnetization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If die-press and sintering methods are used to produce permanent magnets, then magnetic and crystallographic alignment is achieved in one specific orientation, but the geometry is limited to prismatic shapes and material costs increase due to machining losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic and crystallographic alignmentVSAvoidgeometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing process parameters by using additive manufacturing (direct energy deposition) instead of conventional die-press and sintering. This allows the magnet to be built layer-by-layer with controlled solidification, achieving both complex geometries and precise magnetic/crystallographic alignment through process parameter control rather than post-manufacturing machining

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical die-press consolidation process with a thermal-energy-based additive manufacturing process. Direct energy deposition uses laser or electron beam to melt and solidify material in place, eliminating the need for mechanical pressing and subsequent machining, thereby enabling complex geometries while maintaining alignment precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If die-press and sintering methods are used to produce permanent magnets, then magnetic and crystallographic alignment is achieved, but material costs significantly increase due to machining losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic and crystallographic alignmentVSAvoidmaterial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The additive manufacturing process is self-service in that it builds the magnet directly to its final complex geometry without requiring subsequent machining operations. The process inherently produces near-net-shape parts, eliminating material waste associated with removing excess material through machining while maintaining the required alignment precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

By changing from a subtractive manufacturing approach (die-press + machining) to an additive approach (direct energy deposition), the patent eliminates material loss. The process deposits material only where needed in the final geometry, achieving both alignment precision and material efficiency simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional processing produces uniform texture throughout the magnet, then easy axis alignment is maximized, but regions like corners and surfaces become susceptible to demagnetization under non-uniform fields

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeasy axis alignmentVSAvoidresistance to demagnetization
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by enabling different crystallographic textures and easy axis orientations in different regions of the magnet. Through controlled solidification during additive manufacturing, each region can be tailored with optimal grain orientation for its specific functional requirements, with corners and surfaces having orientations that maximize resistance to local demagnetization stresses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the magnet into multiple regions with different textures and orientations. Rather than a uniform structure, the magnet is divided into zones that can independently optimize for their local magnetic field conditions, with transition regions between different texture zones to manage field continuity and prevent demagnetization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If additive manufacturing is used to achieve location-specific magnetic orientations, then complex shapes and optimized field distribution are enabled, but manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplex shapesVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The additive manufacturing process serves multiple functions simultaneously: it deposits material, controls solidification, orients grains, and creates complex geometries all in one integrated process. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate manufacturing steps and post-processing operations, making the increased capability manageable despite process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the performance and efficiency of permanent magnets by optimizing magnetic field distribution, reducing material costs, and enabling the production of complex shapes that enhance motor efficiencies and reduce material waste.

Implementation Method 1

solidifying the first melt layer in the presence of an externally applied magnetic field, thereby generating a magnetic metal layer containing a plurality of individual voxels, wherein the externally applied magnetic field has a magnetic-field orientation, defined with respect to the scan direction, that is selected to control (i) a magnetic axis within the magnetic metal layer and/or (ii) a crystallographic texture within the magnetic metal layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field alignment: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

exposing a first amount of the feedstock composition to an energy source for melting in a scan direction, thereby generating a first melt layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 3

exposing a first amount of the feedstock composition to an energy source for melting in a scan direction, thereby generating a first melt layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 4

solidifying the first melt layer in the presence of an externally applied magnetic field, thereby generating a magnetic metal layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Data Source

PatentUS11862369B2Permanent magnets with tailored texture and magnetic orientation
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 HRL LAB
  • US11862369B2 patent drawing
  • US11862369B2 patent drawing
  • US11862369B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some variations provide a permanent-magnet structure comprising: a region having a plurality of magnetic domains and a region-average magnetic axis, wherein each of the magnetic domains has a domain magnetic axis that is substantially aligned with the region-average magnetic axis, and wherein the plurality of magnetic domains is characterized by an average magnetic domain size. Within the region, there is a plurality of metal-containing grains characterized by an average grain size, and each of the magnetic domains has a domain easy axis that is dictated by a crystallographic texture of the metal-containing grains. The region has a region-average easy axis based on the average value of the domain easy axis within that region. The region-average magnetic axis and the region-average easy axis form a region-average alignment angle that has a standard deviation less than 30° within the plurality of magnetic domains. Many permanent-magnet structures are disclosed herein.