Additive Manufacturing Scan Line Time Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing techniques face challenges in achieving predictable and repeatable material characteristics for three-dimensional articles, as they are often dependent on the shape and size of the article being built, leading to inconsistencies in microstructure and properties.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of a constant energy beam with a time sink to maintain consistent scan line time across the three-dimensional article, allowing for tailored material characteristics by adjusting scan line direction, speed, and energy density, and potentially using multiple energy beam sources to control build temperature and microstructure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the same melt beam current is used for the entire layer, then the energy input is uniform across the layer, but the scan line time varies causing excessive overmelt on short scan lengths and insufficient energy on long scan lengths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial characteristicsVSAvoidmicrostructure consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting the melt beam current based on scan line length. Shorter scan lines receive reduced energy input while longer scan lines receive increased energy input, maintaining consistent material characteristics and microstructure throughout the layer despite varying scan line lengths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by applying different energy parameters to different regions of the powder bed. Each scan line receives customized energy input according to its specific length, ensuring that local material properties remain consistent across the entire build area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If the energy and scan speed are adjusted to keep time between hatches constant, then the scan line time is consistent, but other parameters such as solidification rate and thermal gradient change affecting microstructural properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan line time consistencyVSAvoidmicrostructural properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes multiple parameters simultaneously - adjusting both scan speed and melt beam current based on scan line length. This coordinated parameter adjustment maintains consistent scan line time while preserving stable solidification rates and thermal gradients, thereby maintaining consistent microstructural properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the scan line time is extended to provide sufficient energy for long scan lines, then energy contribution is adequate, but the build time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy contributionVSAvoidbuild time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing extended energy input only where needed - specifically for longer scan lines. Shorter scan lines maintain their original faster processing time, while longer scan lines receive additional energy input. This localized approach ensures adequate energy contribution for proper fusion without uniformly extending the overall build time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the control and predictability of material characteristics such as tensile strength and microstructure, ensuring consistent properties regardless of the article's shape and size, while minimizing idling time for the energy beam and maintaining optimal build temperature.

Implementation Method 1

directing an energy beam from a first energy beam source over a work table with a constant energy causing a first layer of powder to fuse in first selected locations according to a model to form a first cross section of the three-dimensional article

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy beam fusion: Laser Beam Welding

Implementation Method 2

locations with a shorter scan line time than a maximum scan line time is provided with a time sink before and/or after the scan line so that the scan line time plus the time sink is constant for the first cross section of the three-dimensional article

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime sink:

Data Source

PatentEP3083203B1Method for additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2018.10.31 ARCAM AB
  • EP3083203B1 patent drawingFigure 1A(i)~1B(iii)
  • EP3083203B1 patent drawingFigure 1C(i)~1C(iii)
  • EP3083203B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for forming a three-dimensional article through successive fusion of locations of a powder bed. The method comprising: providing a model of said three-dimensional article; applying a powder layer on a work table; determining a maximum scan length of an energy beam; directing said energy beam from a first energy beam source over said work table with constant energy causing said first powder layer to fuse in first selected locations according to said model to form a first cross section of said three-dimensional article, wherein locations with a shorter scan length than said maximum scan length is provided with a time sink before and/or after said scan line so that the time period between each two adjacent scan lines is constant throughout the manufacture of said three-dimensional article.