Additive Manufacturing Vision Control for Automated Defect Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional additive manufacturing devices require extensive manual intervention for process feedback, tolerance control, and material management, leading to inefficiencies, failed jobs, and unnecessary downtime, especially on low-cost devices.

Innovation Solution

A unified interface with computer vision and machine learning algorithms for real-time monitoring and feedback, automated error correction, and optimized material management, minimizing operator input and improving tolerance control, while predicting manufacturing time and properties based on CAD files.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual control methods are used for additive manufacturing, then operator flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but operator time consumption and labor costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator flexibilityVSAvoidoperator time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the additive manufacturing device automatically performs inspection, measurement, and quality verification tasks without human intervention. The integrated camera system and machine learning algorithms allow the device to self-diagnose and self-correct issues, eliminating the need for operators to manually inspect and measure parts while maintaining operational flexibility through programmable parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with automated vision-based systems. The camera system captures images of manufactured parts, and machine learning algorithms automatically analyze these images to detect defects and measure dimensions, substituting the need for manual visual inspection and physical measurement tools used by operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If extensive manual inspection and parameter adjustment are performed, then tolerance requirements are met, but manufacturing time and production throughput decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetolerance controlVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary quality verification during the manufacturing process itself. The camera system captures images of parts at various stages of production, and machine learning algorithms predict potential quality issues before they become defects, allowing for real-time parameter adjustments that prevent tolerance violations rather than correcting them after the fact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where machine learning algorithms analyze images of manufactured parts and automatically adjust manufacturing parameters in real-time. This closed-loop control ensures tolerance requirements are met while maintaining high throughput, as the system learns from each part produced and continuously optimizes parameters without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated vision systems are implemented, then operator time is reduced and throughput increases, but system complexity and initial costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vision system is designed with multi-functionality to justify its complexity. The same camera and machine learning infrastructure serves multiple purposes: quality inspection, dimensional measurement, defect detection, and process optimization. This universal system replaces multiple separate manual operations, reducing overall system complexity when viewed as an integrated solution rather than individual components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Manufacturing precision

If real-time monitoring and automated correction are implemented, then quality consistency improves, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality consistencyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system implements partial monitoring by focusing computational resources on critical quality parameters and high-risk features rather than analyzing every aspect of each part in equal detail. The system identifies and prioritizes the most important quality indicators based on historical data and part geometry, performing comprehensive analysis only where needed to maintain quality consistency while reducing overall computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10427348B2Automatic process control of additive manufacturing device
Publication Date: 2019.10.01 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH
  • US10427348B2 patent drawing
  • US10427348B2 patent drawing
  • US10427348B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Automatic process control of additive manufacturing. The system includes an additive manufacturing device for making an object and a local network computer controlling the device. At least one camera is provided with a view of a manufacturing volume of the device to generate network accessible images of the object. The computer is programmed to stop the manufacturing process when the object is defective based on the images of the object.