Additive Rotor Blade Assembly With Integrated Component Receptacles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aircraft rotor blade manufacturing is time-consuming and costly due to the need for multiple detail parts and sub-assemblies, which are difficult to produce in few steps due to material variations with pressure and temperature changes, and the integration of electrical and mechanical components leads to stiffness and strength loss, along with high stress concentrations and labor-intensive assembly.

Innovation Solution

The use of additive manufacturing processes, such as Selective Laser Melting (SLM) and Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), to form rotor blades with integrated receptacles for components, reducing the need for multiple parts and enabling the embedding of electrical and mechanical components within the blade structure, thus enhancing structural efficiency and reducing manufacturing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional multi-step manufacturing process with multiple detail parts is used, then control over manufacturing process and meeting operational requirements is improved, but manufacturing time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeeting operational requirementsVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate detail parts into a single integrated rotor blade structure manufactured through additive manufacturing. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate fabrication and assembly steps for individual components, dramatically reducing manufacturing time while maintaining structural integrity and operational requirements through the inherent design capabilities of additive manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in additive manufacturing processes (temperature, pressure, material deposition rates) to enable the formation of complex integrated structures that would be impossible or extremely time-consuming to create through conventional manufacturing. These parameter changes allow for the direct fabrication of monolithic blade structures with embedded features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If precision drilling is used to create bolt holes for electrical and mechanical components, then component placement precision is improved, but blade laminate damage and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehole alignment precisionVSAvoidblade laminate damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates receptacles and mounting features directly into the blade structure during the additive manufacturing process itself, before the blade is put into service. This preliminary action eliminates the need for subsequent precision drilling operations that would damage the laminate, as all component mounting features are pre-formed as integral parts of the blade structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the harmful drilling operation from the manufacturing process by replacing it with additive manufacturing techniques that form receptacles and mounting features directly. This removes the source of laminate damage while maintaining the ability to precisely position electrical and mechanical components within the blade structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If mechanical and electrical components are integrated into the rotor blade, then component functionality is improved, but blade stiffness and strength decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent integrationVSAvoidblade stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent nests electrical and mechanical components within receptacles that are themselves integrated into the blade structure. This nested arrangement allows components to be housed within the blade without compromising the overall structural integrity, as the receptacles are designed to maintain stiffness and strength while providing necessary mounting spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by designing receptacles with specific local properties (such as reinforced walls or strategic positioning) that maintain blade stiffness and strength in critical areas while allowing component integration where needed. The receptacles are strategically placed and dimensioned to minimize impact on overall blade structural performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If separate assembly of multiple blade parts is used, then manufacturing flexibility is improved, but labor intensity and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate assembly operations into a single additive manufacturing process. By fabricating the entire blade structure (or major portions) as one integrated component with embedded receptacles and features, the need for complex multi-step assembly procedures is eliminated, significantly reducing labor intensity and assembly complexity while maintaining manufacturing flexibility through digital design and fabrication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the creation of rotor blades with improved structural efficiency and reduced manufacturing expenses by integrating components within the blade structure, minimizing the need for additional parts and reducing labor and tooling costs, while maintaining component functionality under centrifugal forces.

Implementation Method 1

Selective Laser Melting (SLM)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective Laser Melting: Laser Beam Welding

Implementation Method 2

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFused Deposition Modeling: 3D Printing

Implementation Method 3

a laser to melt and fuse layers of material to one another to form solidified layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS11427350B2Methods of forming and assembling a rotor blade using additive manufacturing processes
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US11427350B2 patent drawing
  • US11427350B2 patent drawing
  • US11427350B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of forming a rotor blade, including forming at least one of a partial upper skin, a partial lower skin, and a partial support network using an additive manufacturing process; and forming a first receptacle in at least a one of the partial upper skin, the partial lower skin, and the partial support network using the additive manufacturing process. The first receptacle is configured to receive of at least one of an electronic component and a mechanical component. In some embodiments, there is a method of manufacturing a rotor blade that includes forming a first locating receptacle in at least one of the upper skin, the lower skin, and the support network using the additive manufacturing process; and positioning at least one of the upper skin, the lower skin, and the support network in a desired position on a fixture based, in part, on the first locating receptacle.