Additive Support Structures with Notches and Trusses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive fabrication techniques face challenges in generating optimal support structures that are easy to remove without compromising the stability of the printed object, often resulting in material waste, increased printing time, and uneven stress distribution.

Innovation Solution

The method involves generating support structures with strategically placed weaker regions, such as notches, and using a graphical user interface-based brush tool for efficient support placement, allowing users to customize the density and distribution of support tips, and employing topology optimization to minimize material usage while maintaining structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If traditional support structures are generated without weaker regions, then structural stability during printing is improved, but ease of removal after printing deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stability during printingVSAvoidease of removal after printing
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure incorporates weaker regions at specific locations where controlled breaking is needed for removal, while maintaining full strength in other areas during printing. This local differentiation allows the structure to be stable during fabrication but easily removable afterward, resolving the contradiction between stability and ease of removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If more support structures are generated to ensure stability, then structural integrity is improved, but material waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes support structure parameters including density, distribution, and material properties to achieve the minimum necessary structural integrity. By carefully tuning these parameters, the solution provides adequate support while minimizing material usage, thus reducing waste without compromising stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If traditional support generation methods are used, then structural coverage is improved, but printing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural coverageVSAvoidprinting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly distributing support structures throughout the entire model, the system identifies and places supports only at specific critical locations where structural coverage is needed. This localized approach maintains adequate support coverage while significantly reducing the overall amount of support material and printing time required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Stability of the object's composition

If support structures are placed densely to ensure stability, then structural support is improved, but ease of operation for removal deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidease of operation for removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is segmented into multiple disconnected components or modular sections that can be independently removed. This segmentation allows for easier operation during removal while maintaining dense structural support during printing, as each segment can be detached without requiring complete disassembly of the entire support structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250001700A1Enhanced support generation techniques for additive fabrication
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 FORMLABS INC
  • US20250001700A1 patent drawing
  • US20250001700A1 patent drawing
  • US20250001700A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for generating a support structure for a three-dimensional object in additive fabrication. The method involves utilizing a processor to generate the support structure, which includes a plurality of support pillars with notches, a plurality of contact structures that connect the support pillars to the object, and a plurality of trusses. The trusses are connected to different support pillars at opposite ends, forming a cohesive structure.