Address Data Refinement Using Service Reports for Geolocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Address data formats vary across locations, leading to inaccuracies in location determination, which affects logistics and navigation services, especially in densely populated areas, and existing geolocation services are either expensive or insufficiently accurate.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize service reports, including geolocation data and field reports, to refine location data by generating amended location data, storing it in a database, and mapping it to addresses, with reliability scoring and cross-validation to ensure accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If address data formats are used from different locations, then coverage of various geographical areas is improved, but location determination accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of geographical areasVSAvoidlocation determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements location-specific address format rules and validation criteria for different geographical areas. Each location has customized parsing rules, validation patterns, and refinement thresholds that are locally optimized. This allows the system to adapt to diverse address formats across regions while maintaining high accuracy through location-aware processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs iterative refinement processes where initial location data is generated, validated against service reports, and continuously improved through feedback loops. Service reports from field operations provide feedback that identifies inaccuracies, which are then corrected and fed back into the system to enhance future location determinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If existing geolocation services are used, then location data can be obtained quickly, but accuracy is insufficient and cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation data acquisition speedVSAvoidlocation data accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of address data including validation, normalization, and initial geocoding before actual location determination is needed. Address formats are pre-validated against known patterns, and common transformations are pre-computed, enabling faster and more accurate real-time location services without relying entirely on expensive external geolocation APIs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service capabilities where it autonomously refines its own location data using internal service reports and validation rules. Rather than depending on external geolocation services, the system uses its own operational data from deliveries and field reports to continuously improve and validate location accuracy, reducing both cost and dependency on external providers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If address validation and refinement processes are implemented, then location accuracy is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation data accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The address validation and refinement process is divided into distinct modular stages: initial parsing, format validation, geocoding, service report verification, and iterative refinement. Each stage handles specific validation rules and transformations independently, making the complex process manageable, testable, and maintainable while ensuring comprehensive accuracy checks at each step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If service reports are used for cross-validation, then location data reliability is improved, but data processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation data reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial validation by selecting a representative subset of service reports for cross-validation rather than processing every single report. It uses sampling strategies and threshold-based filtering to validate location data against sufficient evidence from service reports, achieving high reliability without the prohibitive time cost of exhaustive validation of all available reports.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250277669A1System and method for processing address data
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 SHOPEE IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD
  • US20250277669A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277669A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277669A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are systems, methods, and computer-readable media for processing an address. An example method for processing an address comprises: obtaining, by at least one processor, an address. Additionally, the method comprises generating location data associated with the address. Moreover, the method comprises obtaining at least one service report based on the location data. Further, the method comprises, determining whether the location data requires refinement based on the at least one service report, and generating an amended location data associated with the address based on determining the location data requires refinement.