Address-Based Filtering for Low-Power Load/Store Speculation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Content addressable memory (CAM) structures used for checking memory dependencies in load/store units are power-intensive, necessitating a more efficient method to reduce power consumption without performance degradation.

Innovation Solution

Implement a filtering mechanism that maintains a table of address ranges for previously received instructions, allowing certain instructions to bypass costly CAM lookups by tracking in-flight loads and stores, reducing the need for full or partial address comparisons.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If CAM structures are used to check memory dependencies in load/store units, then ordering violation detection is ensured, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveordering violation detectionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the address comparison function into two parts: a filtering table that handles range-based preliminary filtering, and a CAM structure that handles precise address matching. This segmentation allows the system to avoid unnecessary CAM lookups for addresses that cannot possibly match, thereby reducing power consumption while maintaining detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The filtering table performs preliminary address range checking before addresses are passed to the CAM structure. By pre-filtering addresses that fall outside relevant ranges, the system performs the useful action of eliminating non-matching cases in advance, reducing the workload and power consumption of the subsequent CAM lookup operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If full physical address comparisons are performed for every load/store instruction, then memory dependency accuracy is maintained, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory dependency accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The address comparison process is divided into two stages: first, a rapid range-based filter checks whether the address could potentially match; second, only addresses that pass the filter undergo precise CAM-based comparison. This segmentation eliminates time-wasting comparisons while preserving accuracy for relevant cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The filtering table performs preliminary range validation before full address comparison. Addresses that fail the preliminary range check are immediately discarded without undergoing time-consuming CAM lookups, thus reducing processing time while maintaining accuracy for addresses that require detailed comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If CAM lookups are performed for all incoming instructions, then ordering checks are thorough, but power consumption and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveordering check thoroughnessVSAvoidinstruction processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The instruction processing pipeline is segmented into two paths: a fast path through the filtering table for address range screening, and a slower path through the CAM structure for detailed dependency checking. This segmentation allows the majority of instructions to be processed quickly while maintaining thorough checking for those that require it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The filtering table performs preliminary screening of all incoming instructions to identify only those that require detailed CAM lookup. By performing this preliminary action, the system avoids unnecessary thorough checks on instructions that cannot possibly have ordering violations, thereby improving throughput while maintaining check thoroughness for relevant cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4049132B1Address-based filtering for load/store speculation
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • EP4049132B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4049132B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4049132B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Address-based filtering for load/store speculation includes maintaining a filtering table including table entries associated with ranges of addresses; in response to receiving an ordering check triggering transaction, querying the filtering table using a target address of the ordering check triggering transaction to determine if an instruction dependent upon the ordering check triggering transaction has previously been generated a physical address; and in response to determining that the filtering table lacks an indication that the instruction dependent upon the ordering check triggering transaction has previously been generated a physical address, bypassing a lookup operation in an ordering violation memory structure to determine whether the instruction dependent upon the ordering check triggering transaction is currently in-flight.