Addressable Fire Detection Zones for Localized Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fire suppression systems in data centers and large buildings are inefficient due to the large space required by dedicated fire suppression cylinders, which can disrupt operations and cause unnecessary damage by activating entire rooms rather than targeted zones.

Innovation Solution

An integrated fire suppression system that includes individually addressable fire detection systems, a control system communicatively coupled with building systems such as HVAC, power, and security, allowing for localized responses to fire events by isolating hazard zones and activating only necessary fire suppression nozzles and systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If large dedicated fire suppression cylinders are used throughout each room, then fire suppression capability is improved, but floor space available for data systems is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire suppression capabilityVSAvoidfloor space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The fire suppression system is divided into multiple independently addressable zones with individually controllable nozzles. Each zone can be suppressed independently without affecting other areas, eliminating the need for large centralized suppression cylinders and allowing targeted response to fire locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements localized fire suppression by activating only the nozzles and building systems in the specific zone where fire is detected. This localised approach maintains fire suppression capability while minimizing the space required for suppression equipment and reducing suppressant storage needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If entire room fire suppression is activated, then fire suppression coverage is improved, but operational interruptions and damage to non-affected systems increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire suppression coverageVSAvoidoperational interruptions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The building is divided into multiple addressable zones with independent control. When fire is detected in one zone, only that zone's suppression systems and associated building systems (HVAC, power, security) are activated, preventing operational interruptions in other areas while maintaining comprehensive fire suppression coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system activates only the minimum necessary suppression and building systems in the affected zone rather than shutting down entire rooms or buildings. This partial action approach provides sufficient fire suppression coverage while minimizing harmful effects on operational systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If individually addressable fire detection systems are implemented, then fire detection precision is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire detection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system serves multiple functions: it receives signals from individually addressable fire detection systems, identifies affected zones, and coordinates activation of fire suppression nozzles and building systems (HVAC, power, security). This multi-functionality manages system complexity while enabling precise fire detection and localized response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If localized response with multiple building systems integration is implemented, then fire suppression efficiency is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire suppression efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system merges fire detection, fire suppression control, and building systems management (HVAC, power, security) into a single integrated platform. This consolidation improves fire suppression efficiency by coordinating multiple systems for localized response while managing overall system complexity through unified control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12257467B2System and method for fire suppression by coupling fire detection with building systems
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 KIDDE FIRE PROTECTION LLC
  • US12257467B2 patent drawing
  • US12257467B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated fire suppression system includes a plurality of fire detection systems. Each of the fire detection systems is individually addressable. A control system is communicatively coupled to each of the fire detection systems. A plurality of building systems is communicatively connected to the control system. The plurality of building systems includes at least one of a fire suppression system, an alarm system, a heating ventilation and cooling (HVAC) system, a building power supply system, and a building security system. The control system is configured to provide a localized response to a fire detection by at least one fire detection system in the plurality of fire detection systems, the localized response being a response in at least one of the plurality of building systems.