Adhesive-Bonded Plastic Injection Mold with 3D Printed Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for manufacturing plastic injection molding molds are limited by the complexity and inefficiency of traditional tooling processes, particularly in combining metallic and plastic components, and in providing effective cooling systems.

Innovation Solution

A tool for plastic injection molding is created by combining a metallic mold with a plastic carrier using an adhesive layer, where both components are manufactured through 3D printing, allowing for simplified assembly and integration of cooling ducts, and optionally using injection back-molding for enhanced rigidity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional metal molds are manufactured using conventional machining methods, then manufacturing precision and strength are improved, but manufacturing time and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold manufacturing precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing method from conventional machining to 3D printing (additive manufacturing), fundamentally altering the production parameters. This allows complex mold geometries to be created directly from digital models without traditional machining constraints, reducing manufacturing time while maintaining precision through controlled deposition processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates cooling ducts and other internal features directly into the mold structure during the 3D printing process itself, rather than adding them as separate post-processing steps. This preliminary integration of cooling systems and structural elements eliminates subsequent assembly operations and reduces overall manufacturing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Strength

If metal mold thickness is increased to improve strength and rigidity, then structural integrity is improved, but manufacturing complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold strengthVSAvoidmold structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material from metal to plastic for the mold structure, fundamentally altering the strength-to-weight ratio and structural requirements. This material parameter change allows thinner walls and simpler structures to achieve the same structural integrity, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining strength through the inherent properties of the plastic material and optimized geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses 3D printing technology to create complex three-dimensional mold structures with optimized geometry that cannot be achieved through traditional machining. This enables strength to be achieved through intelligent spatial design and distribution of material rather than simply increasing overall thickness, reducing structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Temperature

If complex cooling systems are integrated into traditional metal molds, then cooling efficiency is improved, but manufacturing complexity and assembly time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidcooling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the cooling system with the mold structure itself, creating an integrated design where cooling ducts are built directly into the mold body during 3D printing. This combination eliminates the need for separate cooling system assembly and reduces the number of components, simplifying the overall device while maintaining effective cooling through direct thermal contact between the ducts and mold cavity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the manufacturing process, reduces the thickness requirements for metallic molds, and enables the production of smaller components with improved cooling efficiency, facilitating the assembly of complex molds with increased rigidity and ease of installation in injection molding machines.

Implementation Method 1

the metallic mold and the plastic carrier are connected to one another by an adhesive layer or by adhesion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

both of which are themselves constructed from a number of plates... A tool for the hot forming of metal sheets, which has a functional layer applied to a base block of the tool in a laser sintering process... the at least one metallic mold is manufactured by a 3D printing process

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D Printing: 3D Printing

Implementation Method 3

the plastic carrier and/or the metallic mold to exhibit recesses which serve as cooling ducts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection cooling: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS11642820B2Tool for plastic injection molding and method for manufacturing the tool
Publication Date: 2023.05.09 MAGNA EXTERIORS BOHEMIA SRO
  • US11642820B2 patent drawing
  • US11642820B2 patent drawing
  • US11642820B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Tool for plastic injection molding consisting of at least one metallic mold and at least one plastic carrier, wherein the metallic mold and the plastic carrier are connected to one another by an adhesive layer.