Adhesive Bonding Airframe Members Solid Insert

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The assembly of torque box structures in conventional tiltrotor aircraft wings is complex due to tight tolerances and limited access, making the installation of fasteners difficult, and the thickness of stringers reduces space for fuel and internal systems.

Innovation Solution

The use of large cell core stiffened panels with solid inserts provides a lightweight, high-stiffness structure that simplifies assembly by using composite materials with matching thermal expansion coefficients, eliminating the need for conventional stringers and improving structural bonding for enhanced stiffness and fuel bay clearance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional stringers and multiple internal support members are used to provide stiffness and structural strength, then structural strength is improved, but the thickness of these members reduces the space available for fuel and internal systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidspace for fuel and internal systems
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the functions of multiple internal support members into a single integrated large cell core structure. This core structure provides the necessary stiffness and structural strength while occupying less space, thereby increasing the volume available for fuel and internal systems within the torque box structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The large cell core structure is strategically positioned and dimensioned to provide local stiffness and support exactly where needed in the torque box structure, rather than using multiple distributed support members. This localized approach maintains structural integrity while minimizing space consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If numerous fasteners are installed to secure structural members and provide stiffness, then structural strength is improved, but the installation becomes difficult and time consuming due to limited access and complicated sealing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the need for numerous fasteners by designing the large cell core structure to be integrated with the skin and support members. This integration eliminates multiple separate fastening operations, simplifying assembly while maintaining structural strength through the unified construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functions of multiple fastened components into a single integrated large cell core structure. By combining the skin, support members, and core into one assembled unit rather than multiple fastened parts, the assembly process becomes simpler and less time-consuming while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If multiple internal support members are used to provide horizontal structural strength, then structural strength is improved, but the device complexity and number of components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehorizontal structural strengthVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple internal support members into a single large cell core structure that provides the same horizontal structural strength. This consolidation reduces the number of components from multiple separate support members to one integrated core, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining structural performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces manufacturing complexity, weight, and cost, while improving structural strength and reducing quality defects, allowing for easier assembly and increased internal space within the torque box structure.

Implementation Method 1

an adhesive joint is disposed between the first and second surfaces structurally bonding the first airframe member to the second airframe member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentEP3357807B1Adhesively joining airframe members at solid insert
Publication Date: 2019.06.26 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC
  • EP3357807B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3357807B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3357807B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5B

AI summary

An airframe assembly (50) for an aircraft (10). The airframe assembly (50) includes a first airframe member (214) having a first skin (202), a second skin (210), a large cell core (204) joined between the first (202) and second (210) skins and a solid insert (208) having a side surface. The solid insert (208) is joined between the first (202) and second (210) skins such that at least a portion of the side surface is adjacent to the large cell core (204). The first skin (202) has a first surface disposed opposite the solid insert (208). The airframe assembly (50) also includes a second airframe member (220) having a second surface (224). An adhesive joint (226) is disposed between the first and second (224) surfaces structurally bonding the first airframe member (214) to the second airframe member (220) such that the second airframe member (224) is positioned opposite the solid insert (208).