Adhesive Dispensing Control Using Predictive Parameter Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for optimizing the dispensing of adhesives from dispensing devices are inefficient due to manual adjustments, which are slow and imprecise, and automatic processes that rely on feedback loops and are prone to errors, leading to waste and suboptimal production.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that use a processor to obtain target parameter values and local parameter values, generate a model describing the relationships between these parameters and intrinsic adhesive properties, and determine controllable settings for the dispensing device to achieve desired adhesive properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustment of dispensing parameters is used, then the operator can adapt to changing conditions, but the adjustment process is slow and lacks precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing conditionsVSAvoidprecision of parameter adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated control system that uses sensors to detect adhesive properties and a controller to automatically adjust dispensing parameters. This substitution eliminates the limitations of human perception and manual adjustment while maintaining adaptability to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback loop where sensors continuously monitor adhesive properties (such as viscosity, temperature, or flow rate) and provide real-time data to the controller. The controller then automatically adjusts dispensing parameters based on this feedback, enabling precise and rapid adaptation to changing conditions without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If automatic feedback loop processes are used, then adjustment speed improves, but errors occur and deviations are only detected after production waste has occurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment speedVSAvoidaccuracy of deviation detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by continuously monitoring adhesive properties before dispensing occurs and detecting deviations from target parameters in real-time. This allows the system to identify and correct issues before they result in production waste, rather than waiting for post-dispensing detection as in traditional feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous real-time feedback monitoring of adhesive properties during the dispensing process. Sensors detect deviations immediately when they occur, and the controller responds by adjusting parameters before significant waste accumulates, improving both reliability and timeliness of correction compared to traditional periodic feedback systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If traditional feedback loops are used, then automatic control is achieved, but deviations are not detected until after they affect production quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic control capabilityVSAvoidtime to detect and correct deviations
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous real-time feedback monitoring that detects deviations from target adhesive properties immediately when they occur during the dispensing process. This continuous monitoring enables the system to respond and correct deviations before they affect production quality, significantly reducing the time loss compared to traditional periodic or post-process detection methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection and correction actions by monitoring adhesive properties in real-time before deviations result in defective products. This proactive approach allows the automated system to prevent quality issues rather than merely responding to them after detection, reducing both time loss and waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250065359A1Method for optimizing the dispensing of an adhesive
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 HENKEL KGAA
  • US20250065359A1 patent drawing
  • US20250065359A1 patent drawing
  • US20250065359A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method and system for optimizing the dispensing of an adhesive from a dispensing device comprising a controllable setting. It consists in obtaining target parameters for a parameter of a structure formed by the adhesive after it is dispensed. Then a value of a local parameter near the dispensing device is obtained, which is a physical parameter of the adhesive in the dispensing device, an environmental condition near the dispensing device or a mechanical parameter of the dispensing device. Then a model of relationships between the local parameter, the parameter of the structure and intrinsic properties of the adhesive is generated. Using this model and the obtained values, a controllable setting for operating the dispensing device is determined to form a structure after dispensing of the adhesive that satisfies the target parameter.