Adhesive Structure with Tissue Piercing Protrusions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical implants require mechanical fixation with sutures or staples for secure placement, which can cause tissue damage and complicate surgical procedures, and there is a need for implants that can adhere to tissues without chemical interaction while minimizing damage.

Innovation Solution

Development of adhesive structures with planar surfaces and rectangular cuboid-based protrusions having pyramidal tips, made from biocompatible polymers, that mechanically interact with tissues to enhance adhesion without chemical bonding, allowing for secure attachment without mechanical fixation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mechanical fixation with sutures or staples is used to secure implant placement, then reliability of implant placement is improved, but tissue damage increases and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant placement securityVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical fixation system (sutures and staples) with a biomimetic adhesive system featuring micropapillae structures on the implant surface. These microprotrusions create mechanical interlocking with tissue at the microscopic level without requiring external fasteners, thereby eliminating suture/staple-related tissue damage while maintaining secure attachment through biological interface mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The implant surface is segmented into numerous micropapillae structures (micro-scale protrusions) distributed across the contact area. This segmentation allows the implant to achieve secure attachment through the cumulative effect of many small mechanical interlocks rather than a few large fixation points, distributing stress and minimizing localized tissue damage while maintaining overall attachment reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If mechanical fixation with sutures or staples is used to secure implant placement, then reliability of implant placement is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant placement securityVSAvoidfixation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the implant body with its fixation functionality by integrating micropapillae structures directly onto the implant surface. This eliminates the need for separate sutures, staples, or other external fixation components, reducing device complexity while maintaining secure placement through the inherent adhesive and mechanical interlocking properties of the microstructured surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The implant's micropapillae structures provide self-fixation capability by automatically creating mechanical interlocks with tissue upon placement. The structure serves both as the implant body and its own fixation mechanism, eliminating the need for additional fixation systems and reducing overall device complexity while ensuring reliable attachment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Force

If protrusions are made large enough to pierce and attach to tissue securely, then adhesion force is improved, but tissue damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion forceVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from macro-scale protrusions to micro-scale micropapillae structures, changing the dimensional scale of the adhesive elements. This dimensional reduction allows the protrusions to penetrate and interlock with tissue at the microscopic level sufficient to generate strong adhesion forces, while the reduced scale prevents excessive tissue damage that would occur with larger protrusions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the geometric parameters of the micropapillae structures, including their height, diameter, spacing, and distribution density across the implant surface. By carefully controlling these parameters, the design achieves sufficient penetration depth for strong mechanical interlocking and adhesion force generation, while keeping the protrusion dimensions small enough to minimize tissue damage and maximize biocompatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10278701B2Adhesive structure with tissue piercing protrusions on its surface
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 ETHICON INC
  • US10278701B2 patent drawing
  • US10278701B2 patent drawing
  • US10278701B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An implant having an adhesive structure comprising a planar surface having two sides and rectangular cuboid-based protrusions having pyramidal tips extending from at least one of said sides, optionally having a porous basic supporting structure, and methods of making and using such implants.