Adiabatic Axial Flow Converter Modular Catalyst Bed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ammonia converters face challenges in maintaining high conversion yield, low energy consumption, and efficient catalyst management due to exothermic reactions at high temperatures and pressures, requiring complex designs and frequent catalyst replacement.

Innovation Solution

An adiabatic axial flow converter with modular catalyst beds, where process gas flows axially through an outer annulus and is converted into a product gas flowing to an inner center tube, allowing for adjustable module configurations, parallel or series operation, and quenching zones to manage pressure drop and catalyst effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If inter-stage cooling is used between catalyst zones to maintain kinetic and equilibrium conditions, then conversion efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst bed is segmented into multiple zones with different catalyst compositions or activities arranged in series. This allows each zone to perform a specific function (e.g., initial conversion, equilibrium adjustment) without requiring external cooling systems between stages, thus maintaining high conversion efficiency while reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor operates with dynamic temperature and pressure profiles along the catalyst bed length, allowing the system to adapt kinetic and equilibrium conditions through the natural progression of the exothermic reaction rather than through active cooling mechanisms. This dynamic approach maintains conversion efficiency while avoiding additional cooling equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If catalyst zones are designed for periodic removal and replacement, then catalyst effectiveness is maintained, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst effectivenessVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst bed is divided into multiple removable modules or cartridges that can be independently accessed and replaced. This segmentation allows for easier maintenance operations compared to traditional fixed beds, as individual catalyst modules can be removed and replaced without shutting down the entire reactor or performing complex disassembly procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The catalyst is contained within nested structures such as pellets within extruders, or catalyst modules within the reactor vessel. This nested design facilitates easier removal and replacement of catalyst while maintaining the integrity of the reactor system, improving both reliability and ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Use of energy by moving object

If axial-radial flow reactors are used to reduce pressure differential, then energy consumption is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor combines axial and radial flow patterns within a single catalyst bed structure, merging the advantages of both flow types. The gas flow enters axially and transitions to radial flow through the catalyst bed, reducing pressure differential and energy consumption while avoiding the need for separate axial and radial reactor sections, thus not increasing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves low reactor pressure drop, easy catalyst maintenance, and optimized gas distribution, enabling high conversion efficiency with flexible module configurations suitable for various chemical processes, including ammonia and methanol synthesis.

Implementation Method 1

process gas passes from an outer annulus via a catalyst bed wherein the process gas is converted to a product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

Adiabatic axial flow converter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic heating: Adiabatic Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11040321B2Adiabatic axial flow converter
Publication Date: 2021.06.22 HALDOR TOPSOE AS
  • US11040321B2 patent drawing
  • US11040321B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an adiabatic axial flow converter, in which process gas passes from an outer annulus via a catalyst bed, wherein the process gas is converted to a product, to an inner centre tube, the catalyst bed comprises at least one module comprising one or more catalyst layers. Feed means are arranged to provide a flow of process gas from the outer annulus to an inlet part of one or more modules, and collector means are arranged to provide a flow of product stream of converted process gas which passes axially through the catalyst bed of one or more of the modules to the centre tube.