Adiabatic Condenser Control for Energy-Water Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing adiabatic condenser and fluid cooler systems do not optimize energy and water usage effectively, as they switch to wet operation based on preset conditions rather than resource availability or cost, leading to inefficiencies in energy and water consumption.

Innovation Solution

The system introduces two control modes: energy savings mode and water savings mode, which dynamically adjust operations based on the cost and availability of energy and water, using a microprocessor-based control system to minimize resource usage, and includes features like air bypass and coil cleaning to enhance efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the system uses preset temperature or pressure conditions to switch between dry and wet operation, then the system can maintain basic cooling function, but energy and water consumption cannot be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidresource optimization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts operating mode based on real-time resource availability and cost rather than fixed preset conditions. The system transitions between dry cooling, wet cooling, and hybrid modes based on current energy and water resource status, allowing continuous optimization rather than static operation at predetermined thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor energy and water resource conditions, then adjust cooling strategy accordingly. The control system receives information about resource availability and cost, processes this feedback, and modifies operation to optimize resource usage while maintaining cooling performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system switches to wet operation at preset conditions, then cooling demand is met, but water consumption is not minimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling demand fulfillmentVSAvoidwater consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines when to activate wet cooling based on real-time assessment of cooling demand and water resource availability. Rather than switching at fixed temperature thresholds, the system continuously evaluates whether wet operation is necessary and adjusts water usage accordingly to minimize consumption while ensuring cooling reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system changes operational parameters based on resource conditions. When water is scarce or costly, the system adjusts by reducing wet cooling activation, modifying spray patterns, or extending dry cooling operation, thereby changing the operational state to conserve water while maintaining adequate cooling performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the system runs fans at high speed to maximize airflow, then cooling capacity is improved, but fan energy usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidfan energy usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Fan speed is dynamically adjusted based on real-time cooling demand and resource conditions. The control system modulates fan speed to match actual cooling requirements rather than operating at constant high speed, reducing energy consumption when full cooling capacity is not needed while maintaining productivity when cooling demand is high.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic modulation of fan speed rather than continuous high-speed operation. Fans operate at variable speeds in response to changing cooling demands and resource availability, creating a periodic adjustment pattern that optimizes the balance between cooling capacity and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Loss of substance

If the system operates in dry mode with adiabatic pads, then water consumption is reduced, but pressure drop increases and airflow is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater conservationVSAvoidairflow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between dry and wet operating modes based on resource conditions and cooling demand. When water is scarce, dry mode is activated with pad bypass to maintain airflow. When cooling demand increases or water becomes more available, the system transitions to wet mode to restore airflow capacity, creating a dynamic balance between water conservation and airflow maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The air flow path is segmented into multiple routes, allowing selective bypass of adiabatic pads during dry operation. The system can direct air through pads when wet cooling is needed or bypass them when water conservation is the priority, segmenting the airflow to optimize the trade-off between water usage and airflow performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces energy and water consumption by optimizing resource usage, lowering operational costs, and conserving resources by delaying wet operation until necessary, while also improving airflow and reducing fan energy usage and water waste through advanced control strategies.

Implementation Method 1

water is used to wet the adiabatic material and lower the temperature of the air passing through the coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

adiabatic condenser or fluid cooler

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdiabatic cooling: Adiabatic Cooling

Implementation Method 3

aluminum micro channel or copper/aluminum fin/tube heat exchangers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS10132577B2Adiabatic refrigerant condenser controls system
Publication Date: 2018.11.20 BALTIMORE AIRCOIL CO INC
  • US10132577B2 patent drawing
  • US10132577B2 patent drawing
  • US10132577B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An adiabatic condenser or fluid cooler is provided. A condensing or fluid cooling coil is provided. An adiabatic pad is provided wherein water can be used to cool the ambient air before entering or impacting the condensing or fluid cooling coil. Controls are provided that can adjust or eliminate the amount of water flowing over the adiabatic pad. The adiabatic pad may also be physically moved to allow ambient air to directly impact the condensing or fluid cooling coil.