Adiabatic Phase Gates for Universal Topological Quantum Computation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current topological quantum computers based on Majorana zero modes are limited to classically simulable operations due to the Clifford group nature, lacking the capability for universal quantum computation without additional phase gates, specifically the π/8 phase gate, which is essential for error correction and quantum speedup.

Innovation Solution

A new type of phase gate is introduced for semiconductor-based Majorana wire systems, allowing for adjustable phase changes between 0 and π or 0 and −π, implemented using Ising anyons and Josephson junctions, enabling universal fault-tolerant quantum computation without explicit braiding, and benchmarked using CHSH measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Clifford operations are used in topological quantum computation, then topological protection is achieved, but universal quantum computation capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopological protectionVSAvoiduniversal quantum computation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines Clifford operations (from braiding and measurement) with an additional phase gate operation to create a universal quantum computation system. The phase gate is integrated into the existing topologically protected framework, merging two previously separate operational modes into a unified system that achieves both protection and universality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the quantum computation system universal by adding the phase gate capability to the existing Clifford operations. This allows the system to perform multiple functions: topologically protected Clifford operations and universal quantum gates including the phase gate, enabling violation of Bell-like inequalities and genuine quantum speedup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If explicit Majorana braiding is implemented, then topological quantum computation is achieved, but device complexity and timing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopological quantum computationVSAvoidbraiding operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential quantum computational capability from the complex braiding operations and implements it through a simpler phase gate mechanism. By separating the phase gate function from the braiding operations, the system achieves universal quantum computation without requiring explicit Majorana braiding, thereby reducing device complexity and timing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical braiding operations with a phase gate implementation that uses Josephson junctions and magnetic flux control. This substitution eliminates the need for precise physical manipulation of Majorana modes through braiding, replacing it with a more controllable electromagnetic field-based approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If π/8 phase gate is added to Clifford operations, then universal quantum computation is enabled, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniversal quantum computationVSAvoidgate operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements the phase gate by changing physical parameters of the system, specifically using magnetic flux to control the phase accumulation in a superconducting loop containing Josephson junctions. By tuning the magnetic flux parameter, the system can achieve the desired π/8 phase shift without adding complex hardware, thereby enabling universal quantum computation with minimal increase in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables universal quantum computation by violating the Bell-like CHSH inequality, bypassing the limitations of Clifford operations and providing a scalable platform for fault-tolerant quantum computing, reducing the need for complex braiding operations and timing precision.

Implementation Method 1

causing a mobile Ising anyon to pass through the adjustable phase gate, thereby creating a targeted phase change in the stationary pair of Ising anyons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTopological interaction:

Implementation Method 2

adjusting a strength of at least one Josephson junction relative to at least one other Josephson junction, the Josephson junctions connecting two or more of the superconducting islands to one another

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJosephson effect: Josephson Effect

Implementation Method 3

a plurality of superconducting regions arranged to form a superconducting loop, wherein adjacent ones of the superconducting regions are connected to one another via respective Josephson junctions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlux confinement:

Implementation Method 4

in a first operational stage, altering a magnetic flux through the adjustable phase gate in a first direction, the first direction comprising either increasing the magnetic flux or decreasing the magnetic flux

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS10346761B2Adiabatic phase gates in parity-based quantum computers
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US10346761B2 patent drawing
  • US10346761B2 patent drawing
  • US10346761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example methods and mechanisms are described herein for implementing and adiabatically operating a topological quantum computing (TQC) phase gate that complements the existing Clifford operations, and thereby allows universal quantum computation with Majorana systems. Further embodiments include a testing system for the phase gate that is feasible with Majorana zero modes and demonstrates violations of the CHSH-Bell inequality. Further, the design used for the testing of the inequality leads directly to a practical platform for performing universal TQC with Majorana wires in which explicit braiding need never occur. Thus, certain embodiments of the disclosed technology involve three synergistically connected aspects of anyonic TQC (in the context of the currently active area of using MZMs for topological quantum computation): a practical phase gate for universal topological quantum computation using MZMs, a precise protocol (using CHSH inequality) for testing that the desired gate operation has been achieved, and bypassing the necessity of MZM braiding (and so avoiding, e.g., problems of nonadiabaticity in the braids).