Adjustable Antler Holder With Telescoping Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for preventing antlers from shrinking during the drying period, such as wedging solid boards between them, are cumbersome and inefficient, as they are difficult to cut to the right length and can easily slip out of place.

Innovation Solution

An adjustable antler holder with engaging surfaces and a support structure that allows for the adjustment of the distance between the engaging members to inhibit shrinking, using V- or U-shaped brackets and a telescoping bar mechanism to maintain the original width of the antlers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a solid board is wedged between the antlers to prevent shrinking, then the antlers can maintain their original width, but the device is cumbersome and difficult to install

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of antler shrinkingVSAvoiddifficulty to wedge into place
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The solid board is divided into two separate engaging members that can independently engage with each antler. This segmentation allows each member to be independently positioned and secured, making the device much easier to install while maintaining the ability to prevent antler shrinking effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The engaging members are made adjustable along the support structure, allowing dynamic positioning to accommodate different antler sizes and shapes. This adjustability simplifies the installation process by enabling easy adaptation to various antler configurations without requiring precise pre-cutting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a solid board is used to prevent antler shrinking, then the antlers can maintain their original width, but the board can easily slip out of place

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of antler shrinkingVSAvoidstability of the board position
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The engaging members are designed with specific local features (such as V-shaped or U-shaped contours) that match the geometry of the antlers. This localized geometric compatibility ensures that the engaging members fit securely against the antler surfaces, preventing slippage while maintaining the required separation distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The engaging members may incorporate different materials with complementary properties - rigid portions for structural support and positioning, combined with friction-enhancing surfaces or flexible elements that increase grip on the antlers, thereby preventing slippage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If a solid board is cut to the right length to fit between antlers, then it can prevent shrinking, but the manufacturing process is cumbersome and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of antler shrinkingVSAvoiddifficulty to cut to right length
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure incorporates an adjustable mechanism (such as a telescoping bar with markings or a sliding scale) that allows the distance between engaging members to be precisely adjusted to match the required length. This eliminates the need for custom cutting for each antler pair, as the same standardized support structure can be adjusted to fit various antler sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is designed as a universal device that can accommodate a range of antler sizes and configurations through adjustment mechanisms. This multi-functionality allows a single standardized component to serve multiple purposes across different antler specimens, eliminating the need for custom manufacturing for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8336855B2Antler holder
Publication Date: 2012.12.25 GRIFFITHS DEREK
  • US8336855B2 patent drawing
  • US8336855B2 patent drawing
  • US8336855B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a first engaging surface can be configured to engage a first region of an antler set, and a second engaging surface can be configured to engage a second region of the antler set. A support structure can support the first and second engaging surfaces. The support structure can be configured to adjust a distance between the second engaging surface and the first engaging surface to inhibit shrinking of a distance between the first and second regions of the antler set.