Adjustable Carriage Grouping Apparatus for High-Speed Packaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional secondary packaging systems are inefficient in handling articles of various shapes and sizes, leading to instability, increased changeover times, and reduced throughput due to the need for reconfiguration and operation at slow speeds to maintain control.

Innovation Solution

An article grouping system with adjustable carriages and a transfer apparatus that allows for the formation of arrays with variable rows and lanes, enabling the handling of unstable articles and continuous operation at high speeds by independently moving carriages and adjusting compartment widths to accommodate different dimensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional secondary packaging systems operate at high speeds, then throughput increases, but primary packages become unstable and fall over or are improperly arranged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput rateVSAvoidprimary package stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamically adjustable compartment widths in the carriages that can change during operation to accommodate different primary package dimensions and stability requirements, allowing high-speed operation while maintaining package stability through real-time adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters including carriage speed, compartment width, and article positioning to optimize both throughput and stability, allowing the system to run at high speeds while adjusting parameters to prevent packages from falling over

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional secondary packaging systems are configured for primary packages of a particular size and shape, then packaging precision is improved, but adaptability to different sizes and shapes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging configuration precisionVSAvoidaccommodation of different article dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The carriages feature dynamically adjustable compartment widths that can be modified to accommodate different primary package sizes and shapes while maintaining precise positioning, eliminating the need for physical reconfiguration of the system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed as a universal platform that can handle various primary package configurations through adjustable carriages and diverters, allowing a single system to perform multiple packaging configurations without requiring dedicated equipment for each package type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If diverters are replaced or rearranged to create different size groups, then adaptability to different article configurations is improved, but changeover time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrouping configuration flexibilityVSAvoidchangeover time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamically adjustable diverters and carriages that can be repositioned or reconfigured quickly through motorized mechanisms, allowing changeover between different grouping configurations without time-consuming manual replacement of physical components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as diverter position, carriage spacing, and compartment configuration through controlled adjustment mechanisms rather than physical replacement, significantly reducing changeover time while maintaining adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If secondary packaging systems run at slow speeds to maintain control, then package stability is improved, but overall throughput rate deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackage control and stabilityVSAvoidthroughput rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic speed control where carriage and diverter speeds are independently adjustable and can be optimized for each packaging configuration, allowing faster operation while maintaining stability through coordinated motion control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes operational parameters including speed, acceleration, and positioning to achieve both high throughput and package stability, allowing the system to run faster than conventional systems while maintaining control through parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3307631B1Systems, apparatus, and methods for grouping articles into arrays of various configurations
Publication Date: 2019.09.04 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • EP3307631B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3307631B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3307631B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

An article grouping system capable of forming arrays of articles having a variable number of rows and lanes is included. The article grouping system includes an infeed carrier apparatus having an infeed carrier surface that is movable in a first direction and an outfeed carrier apparatus having an outfeed carrier surface that is movable in a section direction. A grouping apparatus comprising a plurality of carriages and a carriage drive mechanism operatively connected with each carriage. The carriage drive mechanism causes each carriage to independently move in a third direction from an article receiving zone adjacent to the infeed carrier apparatus to an article discharge zone adjacent to the outfeed carrier apparatus. A transfer apparatus includes a frame and an article stabilization member operatively connected with the frame. The article stabilization member moves from an engaging location in the article discharge zone to a disengaging location.