Adjustable Chock Sliding Surface for Equipment Deformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing adjustable chocks do not allow for sliding of the supported equipment, which is necessary to accommodate deformations due to temperature and pressure variations, and their installation is hindered by curing processes.

Innovation Solution

An adjustable chock kit with a sliding element having a lower friction coefficient, allowing for easy installation and accommodating equipment deformations, featuring a stainless-steel plate and a sliding element with a roughness average Ra less than 0.8 μm to reduce friction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a sliding element with lower friction coefficient is added to enable equipment sliding, then the ability to accommodate deformations is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to accommodate deformationsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The chock is divided into multiple components: a first component (base), a second component (adjustable element), and a sliding element. This segmentation allows each component to have specific functions - the first component provides structural support, the second component enables height adjustment, and the sliding element facilitates deformation accommodation, thereby resolving the contradiction by making the complex functionality manageable through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sliding element acts as an intermediary between the first component and the supported equipment. It mediates the interaction by providing a low-friction interface that allows controlled sliding while still maintaining support functionality. This intermediary approach enables the chock to accommodate deformations without requiring complete redesign of the entire support system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If adjustable chocks are used instead of grout or epoxy resin, then installation time is reduced and operational activities are not limited, but the ability to allow equipment sliding is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation timeVSAvoidability to allow sliding
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The chock incorporates a sliding element that introduces dynamic capability to an otherwise static support device. This sliding element allows the chock to transition from a fixed position to a movable state, enabling it to accommodate thermal and pressure deformations dynamically while maintaining the quick-installation advantage of mechanical chocks over curing-based solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The chock combines different materials with complementary properties: the first and second components provide structural strength and adjustability, while the sliding element (made of materials with low friction coefficients) provides sliding capability. This composite approach integrates multiple functions within a single device, resolving the contradiction between quick installation and sliding capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If the sliding element has a very smooth surface (Ra < 0.8 μm) to reduce friction, then the sliding capability is improved, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding capabilityVSAvoidsurface roughness precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies a quantitative parameter for surface roughness (Ra < 0.8 μm) to optimize the sliding capability. This parameter change approach allows for objective quality control and standardized manufacturing processes. By defining a specific roughness threshold, the patent balances the need for low friction with practical manufacturing capabilities, avoiding excessively stringent requirements while ensuring adequate sliding performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates quick installation without curing and enables sliding to accommodate equipment deformations, enhancing structural safety and reducing operational limitations.

Implementation Method 1

a sliding element provided on the upper bearing surface of the bearing element and having a lower friction coefficient than the upper bearing surface of the bearing element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20260016116A1Adjustable chock having sliding surface and mounting assembly including the adjustable chock
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US20260016116A1 patent drawing
  • US20260016116A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An adjustable chock includes a first component having an upper bearing surface, a second component having a lower bearing surface and a through hole into which a portion of the first component extends, a bearing element having an upper surface and a lower bearing surface in contact with the upper bearing surface of the first component, and a sliding element on the upper surface of the bearing element having a lower coefficient of friction than a coefficient of friction of a material of the bearing element.