Adjustable Compressible Tool Handle with Bias Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tool handles fail to provide adequate shock absorption for various tasks, as they are either too rigid for high-impact activities or too compressible for low-impact tasks, lacking adjustability to suit different applications.

Innovation Solution

A reversibly compressible tool handle with a biasing element, such as a compression spring, and a bias adjustment mechanism that allows users to modify the handle's compressibility by varying the load on the spring, enabling the handle to absorb shock effectively across different usage conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If a rigid handle is used, then force transfer efficiency is improved, but shock absorption capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce transfer efficiencyVSAvoidshock impact to user
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The handle incorporates a sliding mechanism with a biasing element that allows the handle to dynamically adjust its compressibility based on applied force. During normal use, the handle remains relatively rigid for efficient force transfer, but automatically compresses to absorb shock when subjected to impact forces, thus resolving the contradiction between rigidity and shock absorption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The handle's mechanical properties are changed by introducing a biasing element that modifies the stiffness parameter. The spring constant can be adjusted via adjustment mechanism, allowing the handle to transition between rigid and compliant states, thereby optimizing both force transfer efficiency and shock absorption capability under different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a highly compressible handle is used, then shock absorption capability is improved, but force transfer efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorption capabilityVSAvoidforce transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The handle uses a sliding mechanism with friction or detent elements that maintain rigidity during normal force application, but allow compression when shock forces exceed a threshold. This dynamic behavior ensures the handle absorbs shock effectively while maintaining high force transfer efficiency during controlled pushing or pulling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If a fixed compressibility handle is used, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but adaptability to different tasks deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to different tasks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The handle incorporates an adjustable mechanism that allows users to modify the spring constant or compression characteristics based on the specific task requirements. This enables a single handle design to adapt to various applications ranging from light-duty gardening to heavy-duty construction work, significantly improving versatility without overly complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If an adjustable bias mechanism is added, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability of compressibilityVSAvoidhandle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The handle is divided into modular components including the shaft, sliding mechanism, biasing element, and adjustment mechanism. This segmentation allows each component to be independently manufactured and assembled, simplifying the overall manufacturing process despite the added functionality. The adjustment mechanism itself is broken down into discrete elements such as adjustment members, friction elements, or detent mechanisms that can be independently optimized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The handle incorporates automatic compression and rebound functionality through the biasing element, which requires no user intervention during normal operation. The sliding mechanism automatically engages and disengages based on applied forces, reducing the need for complex control systems or additional actuators, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The handle provides customizable shock absorption, reducing user discomfort and injury by adjusting compressibility based on the task's requirements, allowing for optimal force transfer and impact cushioning.

Implementation Method 1

a compression spring providing a biasing force to bias the first longitudinal portion and the second longitudinal portion away from each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a compression spring providing a biasing force to bias the first longitudinal portion and the second longitudinal portion away from each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9969074B2Adjustable compressible tool handle
Publication Date: 2018.05.15 MULTI JUST IMPLEMENTS INC
  • US9969074B2 patent drawing
  • US9969074B2 patent drawing
  • US9969074B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A compressible handle for a tool is reversibly compressible along its longitudinal axis during use of the tool. The handle includes a first longitudinal portion and a second longitudinal portion which can slide in opposing directions relative to each other along the longitudinal axis of the handle. The handle further includes a biasing element providing a biasing force to bias the first longitudinal portion and the second longitudinal portion away from each other, and a bias adjustment mechanism by means of which a user can apply and vary a load applied to the biasing element so as to modify the magnitude of the biasing force and thereby adjust the compressibility of the handle.