Adjustable Cover System for Crop Harvesting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crop harvesting attachments face issues with uneven row spacing, changes in direction, and harvesting on slopes, leading to inefficient feeding of stalky crops due to temperature-dependent polyethylene covers, resulting in piston jumping or loss of corn cobs.

Innovation Solution

An adjustable cover system for picking units with a tensioning device that alters the mechanical tension and elasticity of the cover, allowing adaptation to different harvesting conditions, preventing piston jumping and optimizing the spring and damping behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If the cover surface is made soft to cushion corn cobs, then the cushioning effect is improved, but the cover becomes locally dented and springs back causing cob jumping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecushioning effectVSAvoidcob jumping
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the cover elasticity adjustable through a tensioning device. The cover transitions from a static structure to a dynamic one where the elasticity can be changed based on operating conditions. This allows the cover to adapt its cushioning properties and prevent both excessive softness causing denting/springing and excessive hardness causing poor cushioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by allowing the elasticity parameter of the cover to be adjusted. Through the tensioning device, the mechanical tension in the cover can be modified, thereby changing its elastic properties. This enables optimization of the cushioning effect while preventing cob jumping by finding the appropriate elasticity parameter for different harvesting conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If the cover surface is made hard to maintain shape, then structural stability is improved, but the cushioning of corn cobs is poor causing them to pop out

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidcushioning effect
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cover is transformed from a rigid static structure to a dynamic adjustable structure. The tensioning device enables the cover to change its mechanical properties, allowing it to provide adequate cushioning when needed while maintaining structural stability during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The elasticity parameter of the cover is made variable through the tensioning device. This allows the system to adjust the cushioning parameter dynamically, providing soft cushioning when corn cobs need to be caught and guided, while maintaining sufficient structural integrity to prevent deformation under normal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If polyethylene covers are used for picking units, then material availability is improved, but the spring and damping properties become highly temperature-dependent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial availabilityVSAvoidtemperature independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent addresses temperature dependency by introducing an adjustable tensioning device that compensates for temperature-induced property changes in the polyethylene cover. When temperature changes affect the spring and damping properties, the tensioning device allows manual adjustment to restore optimal performance, thereby achieving temperature independence through parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If a fixed elasticity cover is used, then structural simplicity is improved, but adaptation to different harvesting conditions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover structureVSAvoidharvesting condition adaptation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The cover system is made dynamic and adjustable through the tensioning device. This allows the elasticity parameter to be changed according to different harvesting conditions such as crop moisture content, cob weight, and field conditions. The additional complexity of the tensioning device is justified by the significant gain in adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4331345A1Attachment device
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 CLAAS SELBSTFAHRENDE ERNTEMASCHINEN GMBH
  • EP4331345A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4331345A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4331345A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a front attachment (1) for harvesting crops standing in rows, comprising at least two picking units (8) arranged axially parallel to each other, each of which is at least partially covered by a cover (13) extending in the longitudinal direction of the picking unit (8), preferably a multi-part cover, wherein the elasticity of the cover (13) is adjustable.