Adjustable Deep-Drawing Tool Support for Asymmetric Load Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Deep-drawing processes often result in asymmetric loading of tools due to geometric and process variable disparities, leading to tool tilting, reduced workpiece quality, and potential collisions, especially under high process forces.

Innovation Solution

A device with adjustable support points and measuring devices ensures symmetrical loading by controlling adjustment paths and forces, using a controller to regulate the difference in adjustment paths and forces applied to the tool, thereby compensating for asymmetrical loading and tilting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the ram is guided with small play and appropriate geometry to reduce tilting ability, then the asymmetrical loading is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveram stabilityVSAvoidguide structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the support points of the lower tool adjustable rather than fixed. The support points can move vertically independently to compensate for asymmetrical loading, transforming a static rigid guide structure into a dynamic adaptive system. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining stability through active adjustment rather than through complex rigid guidance mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using measuring devices to detect the positions of the support points and feeding this information to a control device. The control device then adjusts the support point positions to compensate for asymmetrical loading. This closed-loop feedback system maintains tool stability without requiring overly complex mechanical guidance structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If guide bores and pins are integrated in the tool to prevent twisting or tilting, then the tool stability is improved, but the device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool stabilityVSAvoidtool manufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using fixed rigid guide bores and pins that require precise manufacturing, the patent uses adjustable support points with vertical movement capability. This dynamic approach compensates for tool twisting and tilting through controlled position changes rather than through precisely manufactured rigid guides, significantly easing manufacturing requirements while maintaining tool stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple adjustment devices with independent control are used to compensate for asymmetrical loading, then the manufacturing precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece qualityVSAvoidadjustment device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the support system into multiple independently controllable support points, each with its own adjustment device. This allows independent adjustment of each support point to compensate for asymmetrical loading, thereby improving workpiece quality. The segmentation enables precise local adjustments without requiring complex coordinated movement of the entire tool system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adjustment devices serve multiple functions: they support the lower tool, compensate for asymmetrical loading, and enable vertical positioning. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate compensation mechanisms, thereby improving manufacturing precision without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If the support points are fixed relative to the lower tool, then the device complexity is reduced, but the ability to compensate for asymmetrical loading is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport structure complexityVSAvoidloading symmetry
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the fixed support points into dynamically adjustable support points that can move vertically. This dynamic capability enables compensation for asymmetrical loading while maintaining relatively simple support structure geometry. The reliability of loading symmetry is achieved through controlled movement rather than through complex fixed structural arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2492027B1Device for deep-drawing a workpiece
Publication Date: 2014.06.25 SIEMENS AG
  • EP2492027B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2492027B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The device comprises a tool, which has two support points, and two adjusting units (12,14), with which the tool is supported on the two support points. A measuring unit is provided for determining adjustment paths (x-1,x-2) of the adjusting units. A control unit is provided, with which the two adjusting units are controlled corresponding to a difference between the displacement paths. An independent claim is also included for a method for deep drawing of a workpiece.