Adjustable Eyewear Temple Assembly with Biasing Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing eyewear designs often lack adequate adjustability and versatility to accommodate different user configurations, sizes, and features, with temples that are either fixed or minimally adjustable.

Innovation Solution

The eyewear features temples with a front and rear portion that are releasably attachable via a retaining assembly and coupling structure, utilizing a biasing member and retention mechanism to allow for adjustable length and orientation, including a base member with an arcuate cross-section for conforming to the user's head.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If temples are made fixed or minimally adjustable, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to different user configurations is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different user configurationsVSAvoidtemple structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The temple is divided into multiple segments including a front portion, a rear portion, and an intermediate portion with articulation joints. This segmentation allows each segment to move independently, enabling the temple to adapt to different head shapes and sizes while maintaining a manageable structural complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The temple incorporates dynamic elements including articulation joints that allow relative movement between segments, and biasing members that provide controlled elastic deformation. These dynamic features enable the temple to adjust to various user configurations automatically, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If temples are made adjustable to cover different user configurations, then adaptability is improved, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability for different sizes and featuresVSAvoidadjustable mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The temple utilizes parameter changes through elastic deformation of the biasing member and articulation of joints to achieve adjustment. Instead of complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms, the design changes the physical state and configuration of existing components, providing adaptability while minimizing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The biasing member provides automatic adjustment and maintenance of the temple's configuration through elastic forces. The structure self-adjusts to fit different user head shapes without requiring complex control mechanisms, achieving adaptability through self-service functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If temples use integrally formed members, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but adjustability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemple adjustabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The temple is manufactured as separate segments (front portion, rear portion, intermediate portion) that can be produced using standard manufacturing processes. This segmentation maintains ease of manufacture for each individual component while enabling adjustability through the assembly of multiple parts with articulation joints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple separately manufactured temple segments are combined through articulation joints and coupling structures to form a complete adjustable temple assembly. This merging approach preserves the manufacturing simplicity of individual components while achieving the adjustability of a complex integrated structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides enhanced adjustability and comfort by allowing temples to adapt to various head shapes and sizes, minimizing dislodging, and offering multiple secure positions.

Implementation Method 1

A biasing member selectively biases the retention member toward and into the cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a base member with an arcuate cross-section for conforming to the user's head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS12386198B2Eyewear having a temple assembly and temple assembly for eyewear
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 BEZAMAT ASHLEY
  • US12386198B2 patent drawing
  • US12386198B2 patent drawing
  • US12386198B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Eyewear having a frame front, a first temple and a second temple. The first temple extends from a first side of the frame front. The second temple extends from a second side of the frame front. At least one of the first temple and the second temple includes a front portion and a rear portion. Temple structures having a base member are disclosed, along with temples for eyewear and methods of attaching portions of temples of eyewear.