Adjustable Facial Implant with Intermediary Bladder for Postoperative Shape Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current facial reconstruction surgical implants lack the ability to effectively address postoperative shape corrections and aesthetic deficiencies, particularly in restoring or enhancing facial appearance by failing to adapt to individual anatomical variations.

Innovation Solution

An adjustable facial implant with a support structure coupled to the bone surface, an outer shell made of soft material, and an intermediary bladder structure that can be expanded with liquid or gel to contour to predefined anatomy, allowing for postoperative shape adjustments through the use of self-sealing valves and multiple separable zones for precise shape tuning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed-shape facial implant is used, then the implantation procedure is simple, but the implant cannot adapt to individual anatomical variations or postoperative shape corrections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to individual anatomyVSAvoidimplant structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into three main segments: a support structure, an outer shell, and an intermediary bladder structure. This segmentation allows each component to serve a specific function while collectively providing adaptability to individual anatomy through the adjustable bladder volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The implant transitions from a static fixed-shape design to a dynamic adjustable design by incorporating an inflatable bladder structure. The bladder can be filled or emptied to modify the implant's shape and volume, enabling postoperative shape corrections and adaptation to individual anatomical variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a soft outer shell is used, then tissue destabilization and atrophy are minimized, but the implant loses structural support capability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue atrophyVSAvoidstructural support
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The implant combines a rigid support structure (typically metal or rigid polymer) with a soft outer shell (silicone or elastomeric material). This composite construction allows the rigid support structure to provide necessary structural strength while the soft outer shell minimizes tissue atrophy and destabilization by providing a tissue-friendly interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of repair

If postoperative shape correction is enabled, then aesthetic deficiencies can be addressed, but the implant requires additional adjustment mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepostoperative adjustmentVSAvoidadjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant uses a hydraulic or pneumatic system through the inflatable bladder structure to enable postoperative shape correction. By injecting or removing fluid through a catheter and valve system, the implant's volume and shape can be adjusted to address aesthetic deficiencies without requiring complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple separable zones are used, then precise shape tuning is achieved, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The implant is divided into multiple separable zones or compartments within the bladder structure, allowing independent adjustment of different facial regions. This segmentation enables precise shape tuning for complex anatomical variations while the modular design facilitates standardized manufacturing of each zone that can be assembled together.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise postoperative shape correction and enhancement of facial appearance by allowing the implant to adapt to individual anatomical features, minimizing tissue destabilization and atrophy, and providing a mechanism for fine-tuning the implant's shape to achieve natural contours.

Implementation Method 1

an intermediary bladder structure located between the support structure and the outer structure, wherein the internal volume of the bladder is adjusted in response to adapting the outer structure to contour to the predefined anatomy associated with the facial region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS10779926B2Adjustable facial implant device
Publication Date: 2020.09.22 VISAGEX MEDICAL LTD
  • US10779926B2 patent drawing
  • US10779926B2 patent drawing
  • US10779926B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A facial implant device includes a support structure adapted to be coupled to a bone surface within a facial region, an outer structure adapted to contour to a predefined anatomy associated with the facial region, and an intermediary bladder structure located between the support structure and the outer structure. The intermediary bladder structure includes an internal volume that is adjusted in response to adapting the outer structure to contour to the predefined anatomy associated with the facial region.