Adjustable Hip Support in Child Carriers for Position Adaptability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing child carriers lack flexibility and adaptability to accommodate children of different sizes and positions, often resulting in uncomfortable and inefficient carrying experiences.

Innovation Solution

A child carrier design featuring a carrying harness with adjustable components, including a hip support portion that can modify its width and an expandable part to adjust the distance between the torso support and the harness, ensuring a comfortable and secure fit for children of varying sizes and positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed space volume configuration is used for seating a child, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but it cannot accommodate children of different sizes and positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different child sizes and positionsVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the hip support portion adjustable in width. The hip support portion can be modified between a first width and a second width to accommodate children of different sizes and positions. This dynamic adjustment capability allows the child carrier to adapt to various usage scenarios while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure, thus resolving the contradiction between adaptability and structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the hip support portion width is made adjustable, then adaptability to different child sizes improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different child sizesVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the hip support portion into adjustable segments. The hip support portion includes a first panel and a second panel that can be adjusted relative to each other to change the width. This segmentation allows for size adjustment without requiring a completely complex reconfigurable structure, thus improving adaptability while controlling device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the width parameter of the hip support portion. The hip support portion can be adjusted between a first width and a second width to accommodate different child sizes. This direct parameter adjustment approach provides adaptability while maintaining relatively simple adjustment mechanisms, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the greatest bottom distance between torso support portion and carrying harness is adjustable, then comfort and support for different positions improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomfort and support for different positionsVSAvoidexpandable part mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the greatest bottom distance between the torso support portion and the carrying harness adjustable. The expandable part can be modified between a first greatest bottom distance and a second greatest bottom distance to accommodate different carrying positions and comfort requirements. This dynamic adjustment improves ease of operation while keeping the expandable part mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies universality by designing the expandable part to serve multiple functions. The expandable part not only adjusts the greatest bottom distance but also provides structural support and maintains the integrity of the child carrier across different configurations. This multi-functionality approach improves comfort and support for different positions while avoiding the need for separate complex mechanisms for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3556256B1Child carrier
Publication Date: 2021.02.24 WONDERLAND SWITZERLAND AG
  • EP3556256B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3556256B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3556256B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A child carrier (100) includes a carrying harness (110), a child supporting part (120) connected with the carrying harness (110) and including a hip support portion (123), and a hip support adjustment (130) provided on the hip support portion (123), the hip support adjustment (130) being operable to modify a width of the hip support portion (123). Moreover, the child carrier (100) may further include an expandable part (128) disposed above the hip support portion (123), the expandable part (128) being operable to adjust a greatest bottom distance between the torso support portion (122) and the carrying harness (110).