Adjustable Kayak Propulsion System with Independent Paddle Arms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Kayak paddles require significant physical strength and coordination to control and maneuver effectively, especially in varying paddling conditions, and existing paddles do not offer sufficient adjustability or support for efficient propulsion and steering.

Innovation Solution

A kayak propulsion system with a central support and independently adjustable paddle arms that can rotate to different angles, featuring a bottom-mounted or top-mounted support system that angles the paddle blades for better water engagement, allowing for one-handed operation and enhanced stability through vertical rods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a traditional kayak paddle is used, then the kayaker can propel and steer the kayak, but significant physical strength and coordination are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of paddling operationVSAvoidphysical strength required
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The paddle is divided into two separate adjustable shafts (first shaft and second shaft) that can be independently configured. Each shaft connects to a blade and can be adjusted in length and angle, allowing the paddler to optimize each side for minimal effort while maintaining effective propulsion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The paddle shafts are made dynamically adjustable through locking mechanisms that allow the user to change shaft lengths and blade angles during different paddling conditions. This adaptability enables the paddler to optimize the paddle configuration for each specific situation, reducing the physical strength required across varying water conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed-length paddle shaft is used, then the structure is simple, but the paddle cannot be adjusted for varying paddling conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustability to paddling conditionsVSAvoidpaddle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The paddle incorporates adjustable shafts with locking mechanisms that enable dynamic reconfiguration. The first and second shafts can be independently adjusted in length and angle, allowing the paddle to adapt to various paddling conditions such as shallow water, deep water, or different stroke techniques while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The paddle allows changes in critical parameters including shaft length, blade angle, and shaft orientation. By enabling adjustment of these parameters, the paddle can be optimized for different paddling scenarios (e.g., shallow water paddling requiring different angles than deep water) without fundamentally changing the basic paddle structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the paddle shafts are rigidly fixed, then the structure is stable, but the blades cannot be angled for better water engagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade angle adjustmentVSAvoidpaddle structure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The connection between the shafts and blades is designed with adjustable locking mechanisms that provide both stability when locked and adaptability when adjusted. The first and second shafts can be locked at specific angles to engage the blades optimally with the water, yet remain stable once positioned, allowing the paddler to achieve better water engagement without sacrificing structural integrity during use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If a single rigid paddle shaft is used, then the paddle is simple to manufacture, but it requires continuous two-handed control with significant coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of paddle controlVSAvoidpaddle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The traditional single rigid shaft is segmented into two separate adjustable shafts (first shaft and second shaft) that can be independently configured. This segmentation allows each shaft to be optimized for its specific function and enables easier control as each shaft can be adjusted to the paddler's preference, potentially allowing for one-handed operation or asymmetric paddling techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adjustable nature of the segmented shafts provides dynamic control options that enhance ease of operation. The paddler can adjust the length and angle of each shaft independently, allowing for customized control configurations that reduce the coordination effort required compared to a fixed single-shaft design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8986060B2Vehicle propulsion
Publication Date: 2015.03.24 MCCALL MEG
  • US8986060B2 patent drawing
  • US8986060B2 patent drawing
  • US8986060B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle propulsion system having a mount; a rotation shaft oriented substantially normal to a plane of travel of a vehicle; a fixture coupled to the rotation shaft, the fixture being rotatable about a rotation shaft axis of the rotation shaft; and an oar assembly coupled to the fixture; wherein the coupling is coupled to the fixture, wherein the rotation shaft axis is substantially normal to the rotational axis; wherein the coupling is coupled to the fixture to permit rotation of the oar assembly about the rotation axis when the lock is locked.