Adjustable Mobile Stand Without Spring Holding Mechanisms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mobile device stands with complex structures and springs are costly to manufacture and prone to fatigue, failing to securely hold devices of various sizes over time.

Innovation Solution

An angle adjustable stand with a body featuring movable holding units, lateral members, and a support bar with pivotable connectors, allowing for secure positioning of devices of different sizes at desired angles without relying on springs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a pawl device with spring is used to hold mobile devices, then the device can securely hold phones and planar devices, but the structure becomes complicated and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding capabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the spring component from the pawl device, extracting the problematic element that caused complexity and reliability issues. The redesigned device uses a simple pawl mechanism without spring, achieving both structural simplification and maintained holding capability through geometric constraint design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The holding device is segmented into distinct functional components: the pawl element for engagement, the slot for movement, and the guide structure. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently without requiring complex spring-based mechanisms, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a spring-based pawl device is used, then the device can adapt to different sizes, but the spring reaches fatigue point and fails over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize adaptabilityVSAvoiddurability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring is completely removed from the design, eliminating the component subject to fatigue. The adaptability function is achieved through the pawl's ability to engage at different positions along the slot, providing size adaptability without relying on elastic deformation of a spring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The device incorporates dynamic elements through the movable pawl that can slide along the slot and engage at different positions. This dynamic adjustment capability provides adaptability to different device sizes while maintaining reliability through purely mechanical engagement without fatigue-prone spring components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a complicated pawl device structure is used, then the holding function is achieved, but the manufacturing cost becomes high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding functionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the spring and complex adjustment mechanisms, the patent dramatically simplifies the manufacturing process. The holding function is achieved through simple geometric features (pawl, slot, guide) that can be manufactured using basic machining or molding processes, significantly reducing manufacturing cost while maintaining reliable holding capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a complex active mechanism (spring-based pawl device) to achieve holding function, the patent inverts the approach by using a simple passive geometric constraint system. The holding function emerges from the geometry of the pawl and slot interaction rather than from an active spring mechanism, making it simpler and cheaper to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The stand provides reliable and cost-effective support for mobile devices of varying sizes, maintaining stability and adjustability without the limitations of spring-based designs.

Implementation Method 1

The two connectors are pivotably connected to the body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11060655B2Adjustable stand for mobile devices
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 AUTOLAND SCIENTECH
  • US11060655B2 patent drawing
  • US11060655B2 patent drawing
  • US11060655B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An adjustable stand for mobile devices includes a board-like body, and a first holding unit and a second holding unit. The first holding unit is movable between the upper end and the bottom end of the body. The second holding unit is movable between the left side and the right side of the body. Two lateral members are respectively connected to the left side and the right side of the body. A support includes a bar with two arms extending from two ends of the bar. Each arm has a connector and two connectors are pivotably connected to the left and right sides of the body. The bar can be put on a desk top. The mobile device is positioned by the first and second holding units.