Adjustable Computer Mouse Shape With Modular Covers and Buttons

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer mice are not customizable in size and shape, lack luxurious materials, and are prone to damage and noise issues, making them uncomfortable for users with large hands and lacking aesthetic appeal.

Innovation Solution

A computer mouse with a modular design featuring a support unit, driving units for shape adjustment, and a detachable cover made of luxurious materials, allowing for customizable size and shape changes, noise control, and easy portability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the mouse is made with a fixed size and shape, then the manufacturing process is simple, but it is inconvenient for users with large hands and cannot be optimized for different usage scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomizable size and shapeVSAvoidmodular structure with multiple components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mouse is divided into multiple detachable modules including a body unit, grip portion, and button assembly. Each module can be independently configured or removed, allowing users to customize the size and shape according to their hand size and preferences while maintaining simple manufacturing of individual components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mouse incorporates adjustable components that can be dynamically reconfigured during use. The grip portion can be extended or repositioned, and buttons can be added or removed based on usage needs, transforming a static device into a dynamically adaptable one without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of manufacture

If low-cost synthetic resin material is used, then the manufacturing cost is reduced, but the luxurious image and aesthetic appeal are not satisfied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelow manufacturing costVSAvoidluxurious appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The mouse combines synthetic resin base material with luxurious surface treatments such as metal plating, leather wrapping, or polished finishes. This composite approach maintains the cost-effectiveness of injection-molded resin while adding aesthetic appeal and luxurious appearance through surface layers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the mouse have different material qualities - the body may use cost-effective resin while critical touch areas use premium materials like metal or treated leather. This localized application of high-quality materials provides luxurious appearance where needed without significantly increasing overall manufacturing cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the mouse is constantly exposed to the outside, then it is easy to access and use, but contamination and impact damage risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidcontamination and impact damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The mouse is designed with detachable modules that can be separated for cleaning and maintenance. The button assembly and grip portion can be removed and washed independently, reducing contamination accumulation while maintaining full accessibility during use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mouse includes protective elements such as rubberized coating on exposed surfaces to resist contamination and minor impacts, and cushioning materials inside the housing to protect internal components from impact damage before they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Adaptability or versatility

If additional buttons and features are added for professional use, then functionality is improved, but noise generation increases in casual environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprofessional functionalityVSAvoidoperation noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The mouse allows dynamic configuration of buttons and features based on usage mode. In casual mode, fewer buttons are engaged or muted to reduce noise, while in professional mode, additional buttons can be activated or their click sound amplified, adapting the noise level to the environment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different buttons have different acoustic characteristics - some are designed for quiet operation with rubberized surfaces that minimize click sound, while others provide full mechanical feedback for professional use. The grip portion may have noise-dampening materials localized where hands contact the device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12416981B2Computer mouse
Publication Date: 2025.09.16 LEE HAN KIEL
  • US12416981B2 patent drawing
  • US12416981B2 patent drawing
  • US12416981B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a computer mouse that may be changed in size and shape. According to an embodiment, the computer mouse includes a first driving unit moving a cover in the front and rear direction to perform an up-and-down operation, a second driving unit moving a plurality of buttons in the left and right direction to perform an open-and-close operation, a sub-button moving the cover backward to raise the cover and at the same time is drawn out to both sides of the body or is drawn into the body when the cover is moved forward, and a third driving unit causing the sub-button to appear and disappear. In addition, a computer mouse that is easy to carry is disclosed. According to an embodiment, the computer mouse includes a mouse body, and a cover member detachably coupled to the mouse body.