Adjustable PEEP Valve for Inline Ventilator Exhalation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-ICU ventilation devices, such as portable emergency devices, lack control over Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP), which is intrinsic to Peak Inspiratory Pressure (PIP) and not adjustable, limiting their ability to meet respiratory demands.

Innovation Solution

A PEEP-valve configured to be placed inline with the exhalation path of a ventilator, functioning as a resistor to provide adjustable PEEP values, allowing higher PEEP levels for any given PIP, lung compliance, and respiratory rate combination, encompassing the range recommended for ARDS patients.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a standard PIP to PEEP ratio of 5:1 is used in non-ICU ventilators, then the device structure remains simple, but the PEEP level cannot be adjusted to meet respiratory demands

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePEEP adjustabilityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an adjustable PEEP valve with a rotatable adjustment knob that dynamically changes the restrictor orifice size. This allows the PEEP level to be continuously adjusted based on respiratory demands while maintaining a relatively simple overall device structure. The dynamic adjustment mechanism resolves the contradiction by enabling adaptability without requiring a completely complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameter of the restrictor orifice size to adjust PEEP levels. By providing multiple restrictor orifices of different sizes that can be selectively activated through the adjustment knob, the system achieves varying PEEP levels (e.g., 5 cm-H2O, 10 cm-H2O, 15 cm-H2O) without fundamentally redesigning the entire ventilator system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed PEEP valve with preset orifice size is used, then the device complexity is minimized, but the PEEP level cannot be adjusted for different respiratory conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePEEP level adjustmentVSAvoidvalve mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the restrictor orifices into multiple discrete sizes (e.g., first restrictor orifice, second restrictor orifice) that can be independently selected. Each orifice corresponds to a specific PEEP level, allowing the user to choose the appropriate level for different respiratory conditions. This segmentation approach provides adjustability while keeping the valve mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adjustment knob provides dynamic selection between different restrictor orifices, transforming a static fixed valve into a dynamic adjustable valve. The knob can rotate to different positions (e.g., first position, second position, third position) to activate different orifices, enabling real-time adaptation to changing respiratory demands without adding excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stress or pressure

If the PEEP valve restrictor orifice size is increased to provide higher PEEP values, then the PEEP level meets ARDS protocol requirements, but the exhalation flow is more restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePEEP levelVSAvoidexhalation flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent allows dynamic adjustment of the restrictor orifice size to balance PEEP level and exhalation flow rate. By providing multiple orifices of different sizes, the user can select an appropriate balance point based on the patient's respiratory conditions. This dynamic adjustment capability resolves the contradiction by enabling optimization of both parameters rather than fixing one at the expense of the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameter of orifice size to simultaneously affect both PEEP level and exhalation flow rate. By providing a range of orifice sizes (e.g., 0.040 to 0.200 inches in diameter), the system allows users to adjust these parameters to match specific clinical requirements, resolving the contradiction through parameter optimization rather than fixed design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The PEEP-valve consistently maintains PEEP above the ARDS Network's minimum of 5 cm-H2O, supporting respiratory rates of less than 35 BPM and duration of inspiration less than duration of expiration, while providing higher PEEP values compared to standard PIP to PEEP ratios, enhancing ventilation for patients with stiff lungs.

Implementation Method 1

The PEEP-valve has a restrictor orifice with a preset size to create a fixed resistance against exhalation flow

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow restriction through orifice: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

The adjustable PEEP-valve version has a plurality of settings so that the desired higher PEEP can be selected by rotating an adjustment knob

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational movement controlling flow: Valve

Data Source

PatentUS20230075412A1Adjustable peep valves for ventilators
Publication Date: 2023.03.09 VORTRAN MEDICAL TECH 1
  • US20230075412A1 patent drawing
  • US20230075412A1 patent drawing
  • US20230075412A1 patent drawing

AI summary

PEEP-valves configured to be placed inline with the exhalation path of a ventilator and ahead of the exhalation valve. The PEEP-valve functions as a resistor that can provide a higher PEEP value for any given PIP, lung compliance, and respiratory rate combination compared to a standard PIP to PEEP ratio.