Adjustable Golf Putting Training Device with Guide Pins

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional golf putting training devices are often cumbersome, expensive, or limited in their ability to effectively train the golf putting swing due to their design and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A golf putting training device with a body comprising two elongate portions joined by a center arcuate recess, featuring guide pins and adjustable difficulty settings, allowing for customizable training by forming a channel that accommodates different skill levels and providing visual feedback and muscle memory training.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional putting training devices use electronics and lasers, then training precision and feedback are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential training function from complex electronic systems and implements it through simple mechanical guide pins and alignment features. The guide pins provide tactile feedback and visual alignment without requiring electronics, lasers, or power sources, thereby maintaining training precision while eliminating device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses inexpensive, simple materials such as plastic or metal guide pins, mounting brackets, and alignment features instead of expensive electronic components. These simple mechanical elements can be easily manufactured and replaced if needed, providing cost-effective training functionality without the high cost of electronic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Measurement precision

If conventional putting training devices use electronics and lasers, then training feedback is improved, but expense increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining feedbackVSAvoidexpense
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs low-cost mechanical components including guide pins, mounting brackets, and alignment features that can be manufactured from inexpensive materials like plastic or metal. These components provide effective training feedback through tactile and visual cues without requiring expensive electronic systems, lasers, or power sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The training device provides self-contained mechanical feedback through guide pins and alignment features that require no external power sources, electronics, or complex systems. The device serves itself through pure mechanical interaction, eliminating the need for batteries, motors, sensors, or electronic feedback systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If conventional putting training devices use a short physical guide, then device simplicity is maintained, but training effectiveness is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidtraining effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements adjustability through multiple mounting brackets positioned at different locations and angles, allowing guide pins to be repositioned to match various putting stroke types and difficulty levels. This dynamic reconfigurability enables the simple mechanical device to adapt to different training needs, stroke styles, and skill levels without adding electronic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device is divided into separate modular components including multiple mounting brackets, guide pins, and alignment features that can be independently positioned and configured. This segmentation allows flexible arrangement of training elements to accommodate different putting styles and difficulty levels while maintaining overall device simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20230149788A1Golf putting training device
Publication Date: 2023.05.18 PETERICH II SCOTT LAWRENCE
  • US20230149788A1 patent drawing
  • US20230149788A1 patent drawing
  • US20230149788A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A golf putting training device is described. In some implementations, the golf putting training device comprises a body having a first elongate portion and a second elongate portion that are joined by a center portion having an arcuate recess at a proximate end of the first elongate portion and the second elongate portion, with the first elongate portion and the second elongate portion forming a channel that has the arcuate recess at a proximate end and an opening at a distal end. The golf putting training device further comprises two guide pins, with each of the first elongate portion and the second elongate portion including a first mounting aperture pair disposed near a proximate end and a second mounting aperture pair disposed near a distal end, as well as one or more guide aperture pairs, each pair constructed to receive the two guide pins.