Adjustable Residue Handling System for Agricultural Harvesters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current agricultural harvesters lack an adjustable and cost-effective residue handling system that effectively processes and distributes non-grain crop material (MOG) for efficient nutrient assimilation into the soil.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a residue handling system featuring rotating knives, counter-knives, and a pivoting platform that adjusts the flow and orientation of MOG, allowing for various treatment options and enhanced chopping efficiency by presenting straw in a more aligned plane to the chopper blades.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional fixed residue handling system is used, then the structure is simple and cost-effective, but the treatment options for MOG are limited and chopping effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment options for MOGVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The residue handling system employs adjustable counter-knives that can be positioned at different locations relative to the rotating knives, allowing dynamic adjustment of chopping intensity and residue treatment options. The counter-knives can be moved between multiple positions to vary the gap distance, enabling the system to adapt to different crop residue types and desired output configurations without requiring multiple complete systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The chopping mechanism is divided into separate components: rotating knives mounted on a rotor and adjustable counter-knives that can be independently positioned. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized separately and adjusted independently, providing versatile treatment options while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure that can be built from modular parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If the counter-knives are positioned far from the rotating knives, then the system structure is simpler, but the chopping effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechopping effectivenessVSAvoidadjustable mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The counter-knives are designed with adjustable positioning mechanisms that allow them to be moved closer to or farther from the rotating knives based on operational requirements. When maximum chopping effectiveness is needed, the counter-knives can be positioned close to the rotating knives to create a small gap for intensive chopping. When less intensive treatment is desired or the system needs to handle larger residue pieces, the counter-knives can be repositioned to increase the gap distance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows changing the critical parameter of gap distance between rotating knives and counter-knives to optimize chopping effectiveness. By adjusting this physical parameter, the system can achieve different levels of chopping intensity appropriate for various crop residue types and field conditions, maximizing productivity without requiring a completely different system configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If a fixed residue handling system is used, then the manufacturing cost is lower, but the ability to distribute residue evenly across the field is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidue distribution controlVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The residue handling system is designed to perform multiple functions through a single adjustable mechanism. The same counter-knives that control chopping effectiveness also influence residue orientation and distribution patterns. By adjusting the counter-knife position, operators can optimize for different outcomes: intensive chopping for fine distribution, or lighter chopping for windrow formation, making the system universally applicable to various residue management strategies without requiring multiple specialized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system provides a wide range of treatment options for MOG, enhances chopping effectiveness, and ensures efficient distribution of residues across the field, facilitating quicker nutrient assimilation into the soil.

Implementation Method 1

a set of rotating knives disposed in a housing, a first set of counter-knives, and a residue pivoting platform and/or a second set of counter-knives

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

The first set of counter-knives are configured to enter the housing proximate to the set of rotating knives

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 3

The residue pivoting platform is positioned proximate to the first set of counter-knives in an upstream direction relative to the crop residue flow direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10588261B2Residue handling system for an agricultural harvester
Publication Date: 2020.03.17 BLUE LEAF I P INC
  • US10588261B2 patent drawing
  • US10588261B2 patent drawing
  • US10588261B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural harvester includes a chassis and a residue handling system carried by the chassis. The residue handling system includes a set of rotating knives disposed in a housing, a first set of counter-knives, and a residue pivoting platform and/or a second set of counter-knives. Crop residue travels through the system in a residue flow direction. The first set of counter-knives are configured to enter the housing proximate to the set of rotating knives. The residue pivoting platform is positioned proximate to the first set of counter-knives in an upstream direction relative to the crop residue flow direction. The second set of counter-knives are configured to enter the housing proximate to the set of rotating knives. The second set of counter-knives are in a downstream direction relative to the crop residue flow from at least one of the residue pivoting platform and the first set of counter-knives.