Adjustable Return Check Valve for Hydraulic Cavitation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Hydraulic machines face inefficiencies in fuel usage due to fixed return check valves, which do not adapt back pressure according to operational demands, leading to suboptimal performance during different operations.

Innovation Solution

An adjustable return check valve is introduced between the directional control valve and the tank, capable of providing low back pressure during typical operations and high back pressure during specific operations like swing operations, utilizing a piston and poppet mechanism with pilot pressure control to optimize fluid flow and prevent cavitation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed return check valve provides predetermined back pressure, then cavitation is prevented, but fuel efficiency deteriorates due to excessive back pressure during operations where cavitation is not a risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecavitation preventionVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The return check valve is transformed from a static fixed-pressure device to a dynamic adjustable-pressure device. A piston mechanism with spring loading allows the back pressure to be dynamically adjusted based on operational conditions. The piston can move between different positions (first position for low back pressure, second position for high back pressure) to adapt to different operational requirements, thereby preventing cavitation only when necessary and improving fuel efficiency during normal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If back pressure is increased to ensure cavitation prevention during all operations, then reliability improves, but energy consumption increases due to continuous high back pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecavitation preventionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The back pressure parameter of the return check valve is made variable rather than fixed. The system changes the back pressure parameter between two distinct states: a first back pressure value during typical operations and a second back pressure value during swing operations or when cavitation risk is detected. This parameter change is achieved through the piston mechanism that adjusts the spring loading on the check valve, allowing the system to optimize energy consumption by applying high back pressure only when cavitation prevention is actually needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a fixed return check valve is used, then device complexity is low, but adaptability to different operational conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve structure simplicityVSAvoidoperational adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The return check valve system is segmented into multiple functional components: a main check valve body, a piston mechanism, spring loading elements, and control passages. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component while achieving overall adaptability. The piston mechanism is divided into a piston body, control passages, and spring assembly, enabling separate control of the back pressure adjustment function from the main valve function, thus providing operational adaptability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The adjustable return check valve enhances fuel efficiency by adapting back pressure to operational needs, reducing fuel consumption and minimizing cavitation risks, particularly during high-cavitation scenarios like swing operations.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing a piston and poppet mechanism with pilot pressure control to optimize fluid flow and prevent cavitation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPilot pressure control: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

minimizing cavitation risks, particularly during high-cavitation scenarios like swing operations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation prevention: Cavitation

Data Source

PatentUS12135046B2Hydraulic machine
Publication Date: 2024.11.05 VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AB
  • US12135046B2 patent drawing
  • US12135046B2 patent drawing
  • US12135046B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hydraulic machine includes an actuator, a tank, a directional control valve disposed between the actuator and the tank, and an adjustable return check valve disposed between the directional control valve and the tank. The directional control valve includes an attachment actuator directional control valve disposed between an attachment actuator of the actuator and the tank and a swing actuator directional control valve disposed between a swing actuator of the actuator and the tank. The adjustable return check valve allows fluid to flow from the attachment actuator directional control valve toward the tank while applying the low back pressure but blocks a flow, and allows fluid to flow from the swing actuator directional control valve toward the tank while applying the high back pressure but blocks a reverse flow.