Adjustable Roller System for Land Mine Detonation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional roller systems for land mine detonation face issues such as bridging, inconsistent ground pressure, and lack of customizability, which can lead to incomplete mine clearance and increased operational power requirements.

Innovation Solution

A roller system with a frame and arm assemblies that include pivotable roller assemblies with adjustable force distribution, allowing for customizable pressure application through a pressure distribution system using struts and a pneumatic or hydraulic piston system, enabling effective mine detonation across varying terrain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If stacked or free-floating rollers are used to follow terrain variations, then adaptability to terrain is improved, but ground coverage completeness deteriorates due to bridging and friction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain adaptationVSAvoidground coverage completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The roller assembly is made dynamically adjustable through a mechanism that allows the roller axis position to be varied relative to the shaft. This enables the roller to adapt to terrain variations while maintaining consistent ground contact, resolving the contradiction between terrain adaptability and ground coverage completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the roller assembly, specifically the distance between the roller axis and shaft, to optimize both terrain following capability and ground contact. By adjusting this parameter, the system achieves reliable ground coverage across varying terrains without bridging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If friction between adjacent rollers is reduced to improve terrain following, then adaptability is improved, but power consumption increases due to increased friction with shaft and ground

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain following capabilityVSAvoidoperational power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic adjustment mechanism allows the roller assembly to optimize its configuration for terrain following while minimizing frictional losses. By enabling controlled movement and positioning, the system reduces unnecessary friction with the shaft and ground, thereby lowering power consumption while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If fixed weight rollers are used to simplify the system, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different mine types deteriorates due to inability to vary pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller assembly structureVSAvoidpressure adjustability for different mines
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The roller assembly incorporates a dynamic pressure adjustment mechanism that allows the force applied to the ground to be varied. This enables the same roller assembly to effectively detonate different types of land mines by adjusting the contact pressure, maintaining versatility without requiring multiple fixed-weight roller sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The roller assembly is designed as a universal component that can perform multiple functions by adjusting its pressure application. The same assembly can handle various mine types (anti-personnel, anti-tank, etc.) by modifying the force exerted on the ground, eliminating the need for specialized rollers for each mine category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If larger central opening diameter is used to accommodate terrain variation, then terrain adaptability is improved, but roller structural strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain variation accommodationVSAvoidroller structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a dynamic adjustment mechanism that allows the roller assembly to achieve the necessary terrain accommodation without requiring an excessively large central opening. By adjusting the roller axis position relative to the shaft, the system maintains both structural integrity and adaptability to terrain variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures complete ground coverage and adjustable force application, enhancing mine clearance efficiency and reducing operational power needs by maintaining consistent pressure across different terrain variations and mine types.

Implementation Method 1

A roller system with a frame and arm assemblies that include pivotable roller assemblies with adjustable force distribution, allowing for customizable pressure application through a pressure distribution system using struts and a pneumatic or hydraulic piston system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic or hydraulic pressure: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentUS8763506B2Roller system
Publication Date: 2014.07.01 HUMANISTIC ROBOTICS INC
  • US8763506B2 patent drawing
  • US8763506B2 patent drawing
  • US8763506B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A roller system including a frame, a plurality of arm assemblies configured to apply a force to a surface, each arm assembly including an arm pivotably connected to the frame and a roller assembly pivotably connected to the arm and having a plurality of rollers configured to engage with the surface, and a pressure distribution system configured to adjust the force applied to the surface by at least one of the plurality of arm assemblies.